citation_inspection: 20548
This data as json
rowid | narrative | desc | web_siteName | kind | hash_id | web_inspectionDate | code | repeat | pdf_insp_type | pdf_animals_total | web_certType | pdf_customer_id | pdf_customer_name | pdf_customer_addr | customer_state | pdf_site_id | doccloud_url | lat | lng |
---|
** The primary enclosures(cid:25) for the muntjac, llamas, pigs, goats and sheep did not have a public attendant. On the first day of the inspection, when the facility did not have any public visitors at the park, the Executive Director stated that they would have an attendant accompany the public groups when they entered the park. That was not displayed on the second day of the inspection. While discussing the exit briefing there were two public groups present at different ends of the petting zoo area feeding animals without any public attendant. All petting zoo areas should have monitoring by a public attendant that is responsible, knowledgeable, and readily identifiable at all times during public contact to ensure the safety of the animals and public. Correct by October 11, 2014
rowid | 20548 |
desc | HANDLING OF ANIMALS. |
web_siteName | EMERALD COAST WILDLIFE REFUGE |
kind | |
Incident hash_id | 8ee3d02e3d110b8c |
web_inspectionDate | 2015-10-06 |
code | 2.131(d)(2) |
repeat | 0 |
pdf_insp_type | ROUTINE INSPECTION |
pdf_animals_total | 58.0 |
web_certType | Class C - Exhibitor |
pdf_customer_id | 36333.0 |
pdf_customer_name | Emerald Coast Wildlife Refuge |
pdf_customer_addr | 105 Santa Rosa Blvd Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548 |
customer_state | FL |
pdf_site_id | 002 |
doccloud_url | https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23514176-aphis-inspection-278151305243336 |
lat | |
lng |