{"rowid": 1, "narrative": "At the south farm, a goat was observed to jump up onto the ledge of the concrete foundation and move from pen 4\nover to pen 5 and then back to pen 4 again. There was a panel up on the ledge in place to prevent this, however\nthe goat could pass between the vertical supports of the panel. Also, the panel had some free ends of wire that if\nbent out could become sharp points exposed to any goat that climbs up on the concrete ledge. Lack of proper\ncontainment and exposure to sharp points could lead to injury or other adverse events. The facility must ensure\nthat enclosures are structurally sound and maintained in good repair to contain the animals and protect them from\ninjury.\nCorrect by October 5, 2016.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives on 9/26 thru 9/27/2016.", "desc": "FACILITIES, GENERAL.", "web_siteName": "UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "c14125ba5346e5c4", "label": "c14125ba5346e5c4"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-09-26", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 653.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 2.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Utah State University", "pdf_customer_addr": "V.P. For Research/1450 Old Main Hill\nLogan, UT 84322", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470072-aphis-inspection-2016082567941113", "lat": 41.7421403, "lng": -111.809059}
{"rowid": 2, "narrative": "Two bottles of Heparin (one partially used, one unopened) and one partially used tube of Puralube eye lubrication\nointment were found in room 140 at ATRC building that were expired (06/2017 and 05/2016 respectively). In the\nrefrigerator in the Stallion Barn lab area, a syringe containing a white liquid was unlabeled and undated. Liquids in\nunlabeled syringes are not identifiable and may be incorrectly administrated or improperly used. Expired\nmedications may have compromised efficacy and potency. Use of unlabeled medication or expired drugs may be\nharmful or lead to untowards effects or inadequate treatment. The facility needs to ensure that medications are\nstored and labeled properly and are not being used past their expiration date. Corrected at time of inspection.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nAdditional Inspectors\nSecor Thomas, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "090414fb43ad755a", "label": "090414fb43ad755a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-09-07", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 594.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 2.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Utah State University", "pdf_customer_addr": "V.P. For Research/1450 Old Main Hill\nLogan, UT 84322", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470116-aphis-inspection-2016082568794784", "lat": 41.7421403, "lng": -111.809059}
{"rowid": 3, "narrative": "One expired bottle of Isoflourane (expiration date 20 Aug 2014) was found on a shelf in the procedure room. The\nprocedure utilizing this anesthetic agent had been removed from the protocol in May 2017. Expired medications\nmay have compromised efficacy and potency and use of such does not constitute adequate veterinary care. The\ninstitution needs to ensure that medications are not being used past their expiration date. Expired bottle was\ndisposed of at the end of the inspection.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representative.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "553396bb9bd960ea", "label": "553396bb9bd960ea"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-08-16", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 37.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 5.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Weber State University", "pdf_customer_addr": "3850 Dixon Parkway Department 1027\nOgden, UT 84408", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470143-aphis-inspection-2016082568752284", "lat": 41.1932542, "lng": -111.9460555}
{"rowid": 4, "narrative": "According to facility observational and/or health records, three adult woodrats escaped their primary enclosures. Facility\nrepresentatives confirmed the animals escaped by chewing through the plastic. Animals #1325, #1302 and #1201 each\nescaped from their primary enclosures and into the holding room: #1201 escaped on 11/26/2022 and again on\n12/02/2022; #1325 escaped on 03/11/2022, 04/24/2023, 06/04/2023 and 07/27/2023; #1302 escaped on 09/11/2022,\n10/14/2022 and 01/14/2023. Although all animals were recovered following escape, the woodrat health record states that,\non 09/11/2022, a woodrat (#1302 \"Maddie,\" a desert woodrat) \u201cinjured feet during escape.\u201d The inspector witnessed\neleven woodrat enclosures in active use that were patched by tape and/or plastic at the time of inspection.\nEnclosures that are damaged and have weak points or holes, and/or rough or sharp edges (including such as are\nproduced from chewing) could continue to result in animal escapes and injuries. The registrant must ensure that housing\nis constructed of such material and of such strength as appropriate for the animals involved, and that it is structurally\nsound and maintained in good repair to protect the animals from injury and contain the animals.\nTO BE CORRECTED BY 10/27/2023\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nn", "desc": "Facilities, general.", "web_siteName": "WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "6f536be1f760dfb6", "label": "6f536be1f760dfb6"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-09-12", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 29.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 5.0, "pdf_customer_name": "WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY", "pdf_customer_addr": "3850 Dixon Parkway Department 1027\nOGDEN, UT 84408", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24032395-aphis-inspection-ins-0000892043", "lat": 41.1932542, "lng": -111.9460555}
{"rowid": 5, "narrative": "In August 2015, a cynomolgus macaque placed under anesthesia for a study procedure was observed to have a\nlow body temperature. In order to normalize the animal's core temperature during the procedure, a staff member\nwas directed by a veterinarian to use a hot air source; however, the nozzle of this hot air source was inappropriately\nplaced in a location which subsequently led to thermal injuries and later, euthanasia.\nIt is the responsibility of the research facility to ensure that all scientists, research technicians, animal technicians,\nand other personnel involved in animal care, treatment, and use are qualified to perform necessary or directed\nduties. This responsibility shall be fulfilled in part through the provision of training and appropriate instruction to\nthose personnel.\nCorrective measures were taken, including but not limited to, retraining of all involved staff and observation of\ntechniques by veterinary staff.\nThis item has been corrected by the facility.", "desc": "PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "d8fb5331fdf6ef92", "label": "d8fb5331fdf6ef92"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-04-26", "code": "2.32(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 185.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 12.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Utah", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Comparative Medicine\n75 South 2000 East, Suite 311\nSalt Lake City, UT 84112", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470150-aphis-inspection-118162337390350", "lat": 40.76788699999999, "lng": -111.8326796}
{"rowid": 6, "narrative": "Review of facility records for a cynomolgus macaque which was euthanized in August 2015 due to complications\nresulting from an approved procedure indicate that the animal did not receive adequate veterinary care during this\nprocedure.\nAccording to anesthesia records, there was a period of over 30 minutes in which no temperature was recorded\nwhile the animal was under anesthesia for this procedure. This is contrary to the approved protocol which states\nthat a rectal temperature will be continuously monitored under anesthesia. By monitoring the temperature at more\nfrequent intervals, changes in temperature may be identified and addressed sooner. Records indicate that the\nwarming blanket used to maintain body temperature during anesthesia had not been turned on by the veterinary\nteam. Subsequently, the veterinarian authorized the use of a hot air source in an attempt to raise the animal(cid:25)'s body\ntemperature; however the source was inappropriately placed by a staff member and led to thermal injuries to the\nanimal.\nA review of this adverse event indicates that although a clinical veterinarian was present during the procedure, there\nwas a failure of appropriate communication and oversight. The result led to the inappropriate placement of a hot air\nsource by an individual staff member and subsequent animal injury severe enough that euthanasia was warranted.\nFailure to provide animals with appropriate methods of veterinary care and oversight during approved procedures\nmay cause unnecessary pain and distress to the animal.\nEach research facility shall establish and maintain programs of adequate veterinary care that include the availability\nand use of appropriate methods to prevent, control, diagnose, and treat diseases and injuries to the animals.\nThe research facility acted promptly to address this incident by conducting a thorough investigation, self-reporting\nthe incident, and swiftly implementing appropriate corrective actions to prevent future occurrences. Corrective\nactions provided retraining of all personnel involved in the procedure including monitoring associated with this\nprotocol.\nThis item has been corrected by the facility.\nThis inspection was conducted on 04/26/2016 and 04/27/2016.\nExit interview was conducted with a facility representative.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "d8fb5331fdf6ef92", "label": "d8fb5331fdf6ef92"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-04-26", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 185.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 12.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Utah", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Comparative Medicine\n75 South 2000 East, Suite 311\nSalt Lake City, UT 84112", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470150-aphis-inspection-118162337390350", "lat": 40.76788699999999, "lng": -111.8326796}
{"rowid": 7, "narrative": "A review of facility records for the marmoset (microchip # 004-004-103) which died on 23 Dec 2015 following a\nprocedure performed on 21 Dec 2015 found that the PI did not follow the approved protocol in regards to IV catheter\nplacement and IV fluid support as well as amounts and routes of anesthetic and paralytic drugs used during the\nprocedure. The PI did not follow the instructions of the veterinarian and the procedure continued 10 hours rather\nthan the veterinarian recommended 2-3 hours. The animal subsequently died ~33 hours post procedure.\nThe research facility must ensure that the attending veterinarian has the appropriate authority to ensure adequate\nveterinary care is provided and to oversee the adequacy of other aspects of animal care and use. Failure to follow\napproved protocols and veterinary recommendations can result in outcomes such as occurred with this animal.\nPrior to the inspection, changes to the protocol were made to incorporate corrective measures, and new procedures\nwere put in place to prevent a recurrence.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nAdditional Inspectors\nSecor Thomas, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "fb128efc8314b08d", "label": "fb128efc8314b08d"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-09-06", "code": "2.33(a)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 184.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 12.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Utah", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Comparative Medicine\n75 South 2000 East, Suite 311\nSalt Lake City, UT 84112", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470151-aphis-inspection-2016082568894033", "lat": 40.76788699999999, "lng": -111.8326796}
{"rowid": 8, "narrative": "A protocol involving sheep that was approved by the IACUC did not completely list all procedures that were\nperformed and potential side effects of the pulmonary function tests. These tests were performed 20 times on 13\nlambs from January to April 2017.\nFailure to include all procedures and potential side effects does not allow the IACUC to undertake a complete and\nthorough review of animal use to ensure humane care and use of animals.\nThe protocol was amended and has since been been renewed and approved by the IACUC to include all testing\nprocedures, potential side effects and steps to take to reduce risk and manage/treat side effects.\nCorrected prior to the inspection.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives on 5/24/18.\nAdditional Inspectors\nSchnell Michael, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ef7e9038e7df48d1", "label": "ef7e9038e7df48d1"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-05-23", "code": "2.31(e)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 369.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 12.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Utah", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Comparative Medicine\n75 South 2000 East, Suite 311\nSalt Lake City, UT 84112", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470154-aphis-inspection-2016082569157934", "lat": 40.76788699999999, "lng": -111.8326796}
{"rowid": 9, "narrative": "Two marmosets (male 601 858 271, female 844 827 014), were found dead entrapped in their nest box on August 12,\n2020 at 8:04 am during the morning observation . At some point after the afternoon observation at 2:38 pm on August 11,\nthe 2 animals entered their nest box in their home cage and the door to the nest box closed so they could not get out.\nThe animals were entrapped in the box for ~18 hours. The cause of death was overheating and distress.\nPrimary enclosures must be constructed and maintained so that they protect the nonhuman primate from injury and harm.\nAll the doors on the nest boxes in marmoset caging were removed prior to inspection. Corrected prior to inspection.", "desc": "Primary enclosures.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "61d5113bec34534f", "label": "61d5113bec34534f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2020-10-22", "code": "3.80(a)(2)(ii)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 12.0, "pdf_customer_name": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "pdf_customer_addr": "OFFICE OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE\n75 SOUTH 2000 EAST, SUITE 311\nSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470156-aphis-inspection-2016090000458931", "lat": 40.76788699999999, "lng": -111.8326796}
{"rowid": 10, "narrative": "Several incidents of deaths/illness due to anesthetic procedures have occurred in the marmosets.\n1)On September 10, 2019 , a male Marmoset (844 835 601) underwent a 6 hour surgical procedure. Multiple I.V.\ncatheterization attempts were made prior to successful placement with visible bruising at the saphenous catheter site and\nlateral thigh muscle. One massage of hind limbs was recorded during the surgery. Upon recovery it was noted that his\nleft rear leg was swollen and he was dragging it and lacked a pain response. The PI and the on-call veterinarian were\nnotified within one hour of extubation and the veterinarian was to check on him in the am. On 9/11/2019, the marmoset\nwas found dead at the first check in the morning at ~ 8 am. Deep vein thrombosis was confirmed at necropsy.\n2)On January 29, 2020, a male Marmoset(844 837 257) was anesthetized and the technician remembered that he was\nparticularly difficult to intubate. During recovery an increased respiratory rate was noted and the animal developed\nrespiratory difficulties resulting in euthanasia on 2/1/2020. Necropsy revealed acute laryngitis/pharyngitis due to trauma\nof intubation as cause of death. A marmoset (844 840 303) who had surgery 10/23/2019 also showed respiratory\ndifficulty after recovery from surgery which gradually resolved.\nProcedures like intubation, anesthesia support, and I.V. catheterization when not performed adequately can cause harm,\ninjury and death to the animals.\nEquipment utilized and care delivered including intubation and catheterization before, during and after procedures must\nbe in accordance with current established veterinary medical and nursing procedures.\nCorrected prior to inspections.", "desc": "Attending veterinarian and adequate veterinary care.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "61d5113bec34534f", "label": "61d5113bec34534f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2020-10-22", "code": "2.33(b)(5)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 12.0, "pdf_customer_name": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "pdf_customer_addr": "OFFICE OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE\n75 SOUTH 2000 EAST, SUITE 311\nSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470156-aphis-inspection-2016090000458931", "lat": 40.76788699999999, "lng": -111.8326796}
{"rowid": 11, "narrative": "On January 17, 2020, Eight (8) rabbits (ID 20-101,-102,-103,-104,-105,-106,-109,-110) underwent a 2nd surgery to\nimplant a supplemental lens after a first surgery was conducted 14 days earlier. The second surgery was not included in\nthe IACUC approved protocol.\nAll proposed and approved animal use activities must include a complete description of the proposed use of the animals.\nIncomplete descriptions of all procedures do not allow the IACUC to fully assess the protocol to ensure the safe and\nhumane use of the animals. The protocol was amended and the renewal includes the second surgery. Corrected by the\ntime of inspection.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "61d5113bec34534f", "label": "61d5113bec34534f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2020-10-22", "code": "2.31(e)(3)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 12.0, "pdf_customer_name": "UNIVERSITY OF UTAH", "pdf_customer_addr": "OFFICE OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE\n75 SOUTH 2000 EAST, SUITE 311\nSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112", "customer_state": "UT", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470156-aphis-inspection-2016090000458931", "lat": 40.76788699999999, "lng": -111.8326796}
{"rowid": 12, "narrative": "**Several expired medications were found in the Vet Med Dept lock box during inspection. The following expired\nmedications were noted:\n-Euthasol solution, Lot #3861, expiration 1/2016, 2 vials\n-Euthasol solution, Lot #E0153, expiration 7/2016, 1 vial\n**Expired medications should not be used in the treatment of regulated animals. Expired medications should be\neither clearly labeled as expired or disposed of in a proper manner. It is the responsibility of the IACUC to ensure\nthat the methods utilized in the prevention and treatment of diseases and/or injuries are in accordance with\nestablished standard veterinary practices and the regulatory requirements of the Animal Welfare Act.\nCORRECTION:IMMEDIATELY\nTHE INSPECTION AND EXIT BRIEFING WAS CONDUCTED WITH FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "f189a89a4b3a254c", "label": "f189a89a4b3a254c"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-09-20", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 106.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 15.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Alaska Fairbanks", "pdf_customer_addr": "1033 Sheenjek Drive\nP O Box 756980\nFairbanks, AK 99775", "customer_state": "AK", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470179-aphis-inspection-2016082567932581", "lat": 64.8595035, "lng": -147.8438434}
{"rowid": 13, "narrative": "Two IACUC approved protocols did not have an alternative search for procedures that would cause more than\nmomentary or slight pain and distress to the animals.\n**08092013EH00009-02 involving pika was designated as a \"Category D\" which includes procedures for which\nanalgesia, sedation, tranquilization, and/or anesthesia are provided to relieve anticipated pain and/or distress.\nThere was no search for alternatives for the procedures for which anesthesia was to be used in the animals.\n**20150205SF00139-01 involving sheep had a search for alternatives to painful and/or distressful procedures that\nhad the keywords \"indwelling catheters and alternatives\". Other procedures proposed (blood pressure\nmanipulations) would be potentially painful and distressful but no search for alternatives to these methods were\nmade by the principal investigator.\nAlternatives to procedures that may cause more than momentary or slight pain or distress to the animals must be\nconsidered by the principal investigator to ensure that animals are being used in research in the most humane\nmanner to meet scientific goals. Whether alternatives exist or can be used by the principal investigator is not the\ndeciding factor in conducting an appropriate search.\nThe IACUC's review of activities involving animals shall ensure that the principal investigator has considered\nalternatives to procedures that may cause more than momentary or slight pain or distress to the animals, and has\nprovided a written narrative description of the methods and sources, e. g., the Animal Welfare Information Center,\nused to determine that alternatives were not available.\nTo be corrected by 5/31/2015.\nInspection and exit interview conducted with facility representatives and AC VMO, Tracy Thompson, DVM.", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "807f4d02f5bf64ea", "label": "807f4d02f5bf64ea"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-04-27", "code": "2.31(d)(1)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 East University Avenue, Dept. 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470193-aphis-inspection-117151658580751", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 14, "narrative": "The bales of hay being fed to 66 ewes and 65 lambs are being stored outside, with no protection from the elements.\nAt the time of inspection, there was an opened bale of hay that was being fed to these sheep. There were several\nmoldy portions of hay within this bale and an entire side of the bale was bleached in color and covered with mud\nand debris.\nUncovered or improperly stored food can become contaminated by insects, vermin, bacteria, or mold. Ingestion of\nthis contaminated food can lead to animal illness or disease. Supplies of food and bedding shall be stored in\nfacilities which adequately protect such supplies against deterioration, molding, or contamination by vermin.\nTo be corrected by: September 14, 2017\nThis inspection was conducted with the attending veterinarian and the exit interview was conducted with the\nattending veterinarian, associate vice president, and two facility staff.", "desc": "FACILITIES, GENERAL.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "4e9ff799b13bb3da", "label": "4e9ff799b13bb3da"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-08-31", "code": "3.125(c)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 131.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 East University Avenue, Dept. 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470195-aphis-inspection-2016082568771610", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 15, "narrative": "***Facility personnel did not perform adequate daily observations of two sheep, ID #7070 and #8020, by failing to\ncommunicate their health conditions to the attending veterinarian.\nWritten daily observations provided by the facility indicate that on 06/03/18 sheep #8020 \u201chad no interest in food.\u201d\nOn 06/09/18, sheep #8020 \u201cwasn\u2019t eating and was laying down.\u201d On 06/10/18 he was treated for urinary calculi,\nhowever a facility representative stated that the sheep had not been examined by or diagnosed by a veterinarian.\nOn 06/11/18, he was observed to be down and \"didn't get up this morning.\" At the 1PM observation later that day,\nrecords indicate that \u201c8020 died due to complications from urinary calculi.\u201d\nWritten daily observations provided by the facility indicate that from 06/04/18-06/25/18, ewe #7070 had been\nvomiting almost on a daily basis. A facility representative informed the APHIS inspector that he had been feeding\nher alfalfa pellets separately from the herd, as she was very thin and her teeth were worn down. He stated that she\nhad not been seen by a veterinarian recently. On inspection, APHIS inspector observed that ewe #7070 was thin,\nand her spine and hip bones were protruding. The attending veterinarian stated that neither he nor the other\nveterinarian on staff had examined either of these sheep.\nAdequate daily observation of all animals and direct communication with the attending veterinarian is critical to\nensure that conditions that can adversely affect health and well-being can be diagnosed and treated in a timely\nmanner. Injuries, diseases, and medical conditions that are not treated properly (as directed by a veterinarian) may\nbe worsened and can lead to prolonged suffering.\nEach research facility shall establish and maintain programs of adequate veterinary care that include daily\nobservations of all animals to assess their health and well-being; provided, however, that daily observation of\nanimals may be accomplished by someone other than the attending veterinarian; and provided further, that a\nmechanism of direct and frequent communication is required so that timely and accurate information on problems of\nanimal health, behavior, and well-being is conveyed to the attending veterinarian.\nTo be corrected from this date forward.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "c804b1dbf05a57d4", "label": "c804b1dbf05a57d4"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-07-10", "code": "2.33(b)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 92.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 East University Avenue, Dept. 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470197-aphis-inspection-2016082569208618", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 16, "narrative": "When inspecting sheep enrolled in several IACUC approved protocols studying the effects of maternal obesity on\noffspring, the inspector observed juvenile ewes being checked for puberty. The puberty checking is performed by\nhousing the ewes with vasectomized rams that wear a dye marker on their chest. The dye marker puts a visible\nmark on the ewes' backs when the vasectomized rams mount the ewes in an effort to breed. This procedure is not\ndescribed in any IACUC approved animal use protocols. Upon request by the inspector, the Director of Research\nIntegrity and Compliance corresponded by email with a representative of the laboratory group of the principal\ninvestigator responsible for this activity. The representative confirmed that the puberty checking was being\nperformed on these animals for regulated, research purposes. The representative also confirmed that they had not\nrequested approval by the IACUC for this activity. If activities involving the care and use of animals at the facility are\nnot reviewed and approved by the IACUC, then the IACUC is unable to ensure that those activities comply with the\nregulations and do not jeopardize the welfare of the animals. The IACUC shall review and approve, require\nmodifications in (to secure approval), or withhold approval of those components of proposed activities related to the\ncare and use of animals. The principal investigators must obtain IACUC approval before conducting any regulated\nanimal care and use activity.\nCORRECT BY: Immediately\nThis inspection was conducted on 18 December 2018 with facility representatives, and this exit interview was\nconducted on 19 December 2018 with Director of Research Integrity and Compliance.", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "7bcc0ef46966beef", "label": "7bcc0ef46966beef"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-12-18", "code": "2.31(c)(6)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 135.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 East University Avenue, Dept. 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470198-aphis-inspection-2016082569353742", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 17, "narrative": "In the enclosure housing 8 sheep at the Multipurpose Building, there was a wooden shelter with a broken side. The\nbroken edges were jagged and there were protruding wires with sharp points. These jagged edges and wires could\ncause injury to the sheep living in this enclosure. All housing facilities shall be structurally sound and maintained in\ngood repair to protect the animals from injury.\nTO BE CORRECTED BY 28 AUGUST 2020.", "desc": "FACILITIES, GENERAL.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ed2ddcb8cccd19da", "label": "ed2ddcb8cccd19da"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2020-08-18", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 28.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 East University Avenue, Dept. 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470200-aphis-inspection-2016082569869152", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 18, "narrative": "In the enclosure housing 8 sheep at the Multipurpose Building, there were dirty water receptacles. The inside walls\nof the water receptacles were coated in a green brown material and there was a layer of sediment along the bottom.\nThis sediment appeared to consist of dirt, feed, grass, and other debris. These two receptacles were the only\naccess to water in the enclosure. Dirty water receptacles can lead to disease or contamination. All water\nreceptacles must kept clean and sanitary.\nTO BE CORRECTED BY 28 AUGUST 2020.", "desc": "WATERING.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ed2ddcb8cccd19da", "label": "ed2ddcb8cccd19da"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2020-08-18", "code": "3.130", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 28.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 East University Avenue, Dept. 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470200-aphis-inspection-2016082569869152", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 19, "narrative": "At the Red Buttes animal facility, an enclosure housing chipmunks had a large amount of overgrown vegetation\nsurrounding the enclosure. On two sides of the enclosure, the vegetation completely obscured the enclosure walls\nfrom the outside. In order to see into the enclosure, the inspector had to stand on a gate due to the height and\ndensity of the weeds. This amount of overgrowth does not allow for proper visualization of the enclosure walls to\nensure that it is in good repair nor does it allow easy visualization of the animals within the enclosure. Overgrown\nvegetation can also be an area for pests or predators to live in, which could lead to disease or injury of the\nchipmunks within. The premises must be kept clear of weeds and in good repair in order to protect the animals from\ninjury and to facilitate proper husbandry practices.\nTO BE CORRECTED BY 28 AUGUST 2020.\nThis inspection was conducted on 8/18/2020 and the exit interview was conducted on 8/19/2020 with facility\nrepresentatives.", "desc": "SANITATION.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ed2ddcb8cccd19da", "label": "ed2ddcb8cccd19da"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2020-08-18", "code": "3.131(c)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 28.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 East University Avenue, Dept. 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470200-aphis-inspection-2016082569869152", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 20, "narrative": "On August 6, 2021, facility staff discovered evidence that six chipmunks had been predated by a raccoon that entered\ntheir enclosure. Following the incident, facility staff added additional wire mesh to cover any potential entrances.\nApproximately two weeks later, the raccoon was trapped by facility staff and relocated. There have been no further cases\nof predation.\nFailure to provide an enclosure that protects the animals from predation can lead to injury or death of the animals. The\noutdoor housing facilities for the chipmunks must be structurally sound and constructed in a way that protects the animals\nwithin from injury. A corrective plan with a reasonable timeline for completion must be developed and initiated.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Facilities, general.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "8899aa815836b844", "label": "8899aa815836b844"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-05-25", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 120.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 16.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University of Wyoming", "pdf_customer_addr": "1000 E. University Ave., Department 3355\nLaramie, WY 82071", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470202-aphis-inspection-2016090000794425", "lat": 41.3139679, "lng": -105.5845168}
{"rowid": 21, "narrative": "Several expired or improperly labeled medications were found during the inspection:\n**A box of Bordetella bronchiseptica Intranasal vaccines, which expired 05 Aug 2013, were found in the refrigerator\nwith the current supply of vaccines and other refrigerated medications.\n**A syringe that had been labeled with pen with what appeared to be \"Buprenorphine\" didn't have an expiration date\nor was so difficult to read that it could not be determined.\n**Two bottles of hydrogen peroxide were found to be expired as of 08/2014.\n**A bottle of injectable Banamine (exp. 7/2014) was comingled with current medications in the lock box in the large\nanimal barn and the Drug Expiration Monthly Check Form on this box showed it checked by a veterinarian on\n8/21/14 and 9/2/14.\n**The refrigerated drug supply in the large animal barn had an unlabeled syringe with a pink fluid, a box of Tetanus\nAntitoxin vials that expired 15 Jul 2014, Intervet Equine Vaccination vial (exp. 15 Aug 2014), and 2 vials of Tetanus\nToxoid (1 exp. 23 Aug 14, 1 exp 19 Jul 14). The Drug Expiration Monthly Check Form for this refrigerator had not\nbeen marked as being checked since 5/14.\nThe facility has a program to check drug stores for medical materials that are expired to remove them from current\ndrug storage but does not appear to be adequate to detect and remove expired medical materials from drug\nstorage areas to prevent their use which would not be an appropriate method to prevent, control, and treat diseases\nand injuries since the expected results cannot be guaranteed and the animals may experience pain and distress\ndue to mistreatment, unrelieved symptoms, or due to unexpected side effects.\nEach research facility shall establish and maintain programs of adequate veterinary care that include:\nthe use of appropriate methods to prevent, control, diagnose, and treat diseases and injuries.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "1a9390fd28b3060a", "label": "1a9390fd28b3060a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-09-10", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 37.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 17.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Eastern Wyoming College", "pdf_customer_addr": "3200 West C Street\nTorrington, WY 82240", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470206-aphis-inspection-254142141010082", "lat": 42.0801168, "lng": -104.1891608}
{"rowid": 22, "narrative": "A 5 month old kitten named Pebbles, ID# 83-4-395, had been diagnosed with a broken leg on 9/6/2014. A\ndiagnosis of a proximal tibial fracture near the growth plate was made and pain medications were given under the\ndirection of a Veterinary Instructor at the time of diagnosis. The kitten had been separated from her enclosure\nmates and was on \"cage rest\" in a hospital that had no elevated resting platform as required under the housing\nstandards (3.6 (b)(4)). No documentation had been made at the time of this inspection on 9/10/2014 regarding a\nplan for management or treatment of this kitten which should have included directions from a veterinarian regarding\nhousing enclosure restrictions, pain management duration, and plan for re-evaluation to determine course of healing\nand use in teaching activities. The pain medication had been changed on 9/5/2014 but it could not be determined if\nthis was directed by a veterinarian as the treatment sheet was signed only by the Program Co-Directors. The\nProgram Co-Director had requested documentation from the Attending Veterinarian and other Veterinary Instructors\ninvolved in the evaluation of this kitten but nothing was available at the time of this inspection. The electronic\nmedical records have been updated as of 9/11/2014 to reflect veterinary input but this was not documented at the\ntime of the inspection.\nIn order to ensure that animal's requiring veterinary care are receiving appropriate and timely treatment, especially\nin the case of painful conditions like a bone fracture, records documenting the diagnosis and treatment plan, which\nincludes any specific needs to reduce pain and prevent further injury, shall be created, updated, and maintained so\nAPHIS and any other personnel involved in the care for these animal's can know what is being done and what the\nexpectations are for recovery and/or follow-up care.\nA mechanism of direct and frequent communication is required so that timely and accurate information on problems\nof animal health, behavior, and well-being is conveyed to the attending veterinarian.\nTo be corrected by 9/16/2014.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "1a9390fd28b3060a", "label": "1a9390fd28b3060a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-09-10", "code": "2.33(b)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 37.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 17.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Eastern Wyoming College", "pdf_customer_addr": "3200 West C Street\nTorrington, WY 82240", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470206-aphis-inspection-254142141010082", "lat": 42.0801168, "lng": -104.1891608}
{"rowid": 23, "narrative": "A Basenji-mix dog named Hudson, ID# 982000362183995, was noted by the APHIS AC VMO to be holding his left\nhind foot up while in his primary enclosure. The dog was removed from the enclosure for examination and the left\nhind foot was found to be swollen and pink when compared to the right hind foot. The dog would bear weight on the\nfoot but frequently held it up in the air and seemed tender when the foot was touched. No one had noted this\nproblem before the APHIS AC VMO had identified the problem. The slatted floor in the primary enclosure had gaps\nthat were wide enough to allow the toes of this dog and another adjacent Boston terrier dog's toes to pass down into\nthe gaps, posing a risk of injury to the toes and feet.\nThe facility does have rubber mats that can be placed in the primary enclosures to protect the dog's feet but had not\nput mats in these two enclosures. Hudson's left hind foot appears to have been injured by the gaps in the slatted\nfloor.\nPrimary enclosures must be constructed and maintained so that they:have floors that are constructed in a manner\nthat protects the dogs' and cats' feet and legs from injury, and that, if of mesh or slatted construction, do not allow\nthe dogs' and cats' feet to pass through any openings in the floor.\nTo be corrected by 9/16/2014.", "desc": "PRIMARY ENCLOSURES.", "web_siteName": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "kind": "Direct", "hash_id": {"value": "1a9390fd28b3060a", "label": "1a9390fd28b3060a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-09-10", "code": "3.6(a)(2)(10)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 37.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 17.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Eastern Wyoming College", "pdf_customer_addr": "3200 West C Street\nTorrington, WY 82240", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470206-aphis-inspection-254142141010082", "lat": 42.0801168, "lng": -104.1891608}
{"rowid": 24, "narrative": "The outdoor enclosure housing 1 horse and 1 goat used for teaching had several wires with sharp ends protruding\ninto the enclosure, posing a risk of injury to the animals.\nThe facility must be constructed of such material and of such strength as appropriate for the animals involved. The\nindoor and outdoor housing facilities shall be structurally sound and shall be maintained in good repair to protect the\nanimals from injury and to contain the animals.\nCorrected during the inspection.\nInspection conducted with facility representatives on 9/10/2014. Exit interview conducted on site with facility\nrepresentatives on 9/16/2014.", "desc": "FACILITIES, GENERAL.", "web_siteName": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "1a9390fd28b3060a", "label": "1a9390fd28b3060a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-09-10", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 37.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 17.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Eastern Wyoming College", "pdf_customer_addr": "3200 West C Street\nTorrington, WY 82240", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470206-aphis-inspection-254142141010082", "lat": 42.0801168, "lng": -104.1891608}
{"rowid": 25, "narrative": "***During the inspection, it was noted that the facility was not following treatment directions provided by the\nveterinarian. A treatment sheet for a 6 year old, neutered, hound mix named Bubba indicated that he had been\nprescribed Rimadyl to be given orally twice a day beginning on 09/22/17 and ending when the medication had\nfinished. On 09/23/17 the treatment sheet indicated that Bubba had only received the medication once that day. It\nwas not until the time of inspection that facility staff realized that the treatment plan had not been properly adhered\nto.\nInjuries and diseases that are not treated properly (as directed by a veterinarian) may be painful and can lead to\nprolonged suffering, infection, and other veterinary care health problems. The facility must use appropriate methods\nto prevent, control, diagnose, and treat diseases and injuries. Any change by the facility staff or students to\nprescribed veterinary treatments should be discussed with and approved by the veterinarian.\nTo be corrected by October 4, 2017\nThis inspection was conducted with the Veterinary Technology Program Director and the exit interview was\nconducted with the program director and two facility representatives.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "43b69eb1f4381f1a", "label": "43b69eb1f4381f1a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-09-27", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 43.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 17.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Eastern Wyoming College", "pdf_customer_addr": "3200 West C Street\nTorrington, WY 82240", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470210-aphis-inspection-2016082568869709", "lat": 42.0801168, "lng": -104.1891608}
{"rowid": 26, "narrative": "There was no one available during business hours to allow APHIS Officials to enter and inspect the facilities,\nproperty, records, and animals on24-Jul-18 at 12:15 PM.\nAPHIS inspector arrived at the facility at approximately 12:15 PM. She was informed by two facility representatives\nthat since the school was on vacation, she would not be able to perform a facility inspection at that time.", "desc": "MISCELLANEOUS.", "web_siteName": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "281b62b587ff20de", "label": "281b62b587ff20de"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-07-24", "code": "2.38(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ATTEMPTED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 17.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Eastern Wyoming College", "pdf_customer_addr": "3200 West C Street\nTorrington, WY 82240", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470211-aphis-inspection-2016082569229206", "lat": 42.0801168, "lng": -104.1891608}
{"rowid": 27, "narrative": "A responsible adult was not available to accompany APHIS Officials during the inspection process at 11:00-11:30am on\n11-AUG-21.\nUpon arriving at the facility, the inspector called all available numbers and left voicemails. The inspector also knocked on\nthe door of the facility multiple times with no answer. After no response from the registrant for 30 minutes, the inspector\nleft.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Miscellaneous.", "web_siteName": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "8fc2c6f7e9946c0f", "label": "8fc2c6f7e9946c0f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-08-11", "code": "2.38(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ATTEMPTED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 17.0, "pdf_customer_name": "EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE", "pdf_customer_addr": "3200 WEST C STREET\nTORRINGTON, WY 82240", "customer_state": "WY", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470216-aphis-inspection-2016090000683976", "lat": 42.0801168, "lng": -104.1891608}
{"rowid": 28, "narrative": "Section 2.38(b) - Access and inspection of records and property: Each research facility shall, during business\nhours, allow APHIS officials: (1) To enter its place of business.\nResponsible persons were not available to allow access and accompany inspection at o9:15 hours on July 29,\n2014.\n.", "desc": "MISCELLANEOUS.", "web_siteName": "QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "17bbe85a89da7862", "label": "17bbe85a89da7862"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-07-29", "code": "2.38(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ATTEMPTED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 18.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Queens Medical Center", "pdf_customer_addr": "1301 Punchbowl Street\nHonolulu, HI 96813", "customer_state": "HI", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470219-aphis-inspection-224141247040767", "lat": 21.3080814, "lng": -157.8543616}
{"rowid": 29, "narrative": "A ram at a sheep flock that is used under a holding protocol and a teaching protocol approved by the facility's\nInstitutional Animal Care and Use Committee was found to be unable to stand on January 24, 2014. The herdsman\nwho discovered the animal in this condition monitored and treated the animal for three days without consulting the\nattending veterinarian. The animal did not improve, and was subsequently euthanized.\nAnimals should be observed on a daily basis to assess their well-being, and any problems should be promptly\ncommunicated to the attending veterinarian, so that appropriate steps can be taken to address health problems. In\nthis case the animal clearly needed prompt veterinary attention, and it was not received. Failure to communicate\nproblems and provide adequate care can result in unnecessary suffering.\nThe facility recognized this failure, reported the event, and has taken appropriate action to correct the problem with\nthe personnel involved.\nAn exit interview was conducted on 9/21/15 with facility representatives.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "d92872eefcec9855", "label": "d92872eefcec9855"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-09-16", "code": "2.33(b)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 19.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Hawaii At Manoa", "pdf_customer_addr": "2425 Campus Road, Sinclair 10\nHonolulu, HI 96822", "customer_state": "HI", "pdf_site_id": "006", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470231-aphis-inspection-328151904460592", "lat": 21.2984663, "lng": -157.8204149}
{"rowid": 30, "narrative": "At the time of inspection, upon reviewing animal use logs, it was discovered that three animals that underwent xray\nprocedures as part of a teaching protocol, had more that the number of xrays that were specified in the teaching\nprotocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).\nThe protocol specifies that no animal shall have more than ten xrays taken, yet the record showed that on 7/1/15\none dog had 18 xrays taken, and on 7/2/15 one dog had 18 xrays taken, and another had 23 xrays taken.\nSignificant changes to the protocol cannot be carried out unless approved by the IACUC. The IACUC is responsible\nfor reviewing all components of proposed animal use, and ensuring that the animals are treated in the most humane\nmanner possible, that protects their well-being. Unapproved changes to protocol specifications, such as excessive\nxrays, could be detrimental to the animals.\nTo be corrected from this time forward.", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA  WCCVT", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "0bd14c25b9d2d034", "label": "0bd14c25b9d2d034"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-09-17", "code": "2.31(c)(7)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 19.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Hawaii At Manoa", "pdf_customer_addr": "2425 Campus Road, Sinclair 10\nHonolulu, HI 96822", "customer_state": "HI", "pdf_site_id": "007", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470232-aphis-inspection-265150151570147", "lat": 21.2984663, "lng": -157.8204149}
{"rowid": 31, "narrative": "At the time of inspection it was discovered that on 12/4/14 a dog was given Ketamine, an anesthetic drug, and the\nvial of Ketamine used had an expiration date of November, 2014 (vial # 5 in drug log).\nAdditionally, the anesthesia machines at the facility were all overdue for service - with \"next service due\" dates\n12/14, 9/13, and 5/15.\nThe facility should ensure that appropriate methods are employed when administering anesthesia, and this includes\nensuring that drugs are not expired, and that anesthesia machines are maintained in optimal condition. Failure to\nmaintain such standards could result in adverse effects for animals undergoing procedures at the facility. Steps\nshould be taken to remedy these problems and ensure that they do not recur.\nUse of expired drugs to be corrected immediately, and service on anesthesia machines to be completed by\n10/20/15.\nAn exit interview was conducted with the Program Director (9/17/15) and the IACUC representatives (9/21/15).", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA  WCCVT", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "0bd14c25b9d2d034", "label": "0bd14c25b9d2d034"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-09-17", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 19.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Hawaii At Manoa", "pdf_customer_addr": "2425 Campus Road, Sinclair 10\nHonolulu, HI 96822", "customer_state": "HI", "pdf_site_id": "007", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470232-aphis-inspection-265150151570147", "lat": 21.2984663, "lng": -157.8204149}
{"rowid": 32, "narrative": "Some defects were observed on the surfaces inside the monk seal pool. The inspector returned to the facility on\n3/22/17, when the pool was scheduled to be drained. Upon viewing the drained pool it was clearly evident that some\nareas of the wall and floors of the pool have significantly deteriorated. On the wall, there are at least a dozen large\npatches measuring up to five inches in diameter or more, where the original surface is missing, and the underlying\nconcrete has a roughened surface. On the floor, there are at least two areas where the surface has also failed,\nincluding one two foot by one foot rectangle where eighty percent of the original surface is missing, and the\nunderlying surface is uneven and rough.\nFailure to maintain the surfaces in good repair could result in ingestion of materials coming off of the pool walls and\nfloor, an inability to adequately clean and disinfect the surfaces, roughened pool bottom that could cause abrasions,\nespecially when the pool is drained, and / or the possibility of contaminants leaching through the unsealed,\ndeteriorated areas in the pool surface, which could affect water quality. Any of these could be detrimental to the\nhealth and well-being of the animals.\nWhereas the facility has contracted an architect to come up with plans for improvements to this exhibit, there is\ncurrently no documented timeline for performing maintenance on the pool surfaces.\nAll surfaces in a marine mammal primary enclosure must be constructed of durable, nontoxic materials that facilitate\ncleaning, and disinfection in order to maintain the desired water quality. All surfaces must be maintained in good\nrepair as part of a regular, ongoing maintenance program.\nTo be corrected by November 20, 2017.\nThis inspection was conducted on 3/20/17 and 3/22/17, and the inspection and exit interview were conducted with\nfacility representatives.", "desc": "FACILITIES, GENERAL.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "5439f2ce9479a28c", "label": "5439f2ce9479a28c"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-03-20", "code": "3.101(a)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 2.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 19.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Hawaii At Manoa", "pdf_customer_addr": "2425 Campus Road, Sinclair 10\nHonolulu, HI 96822", "customer_state": "HI", "pdf_site_id": "002", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470242-aphis-inspection-2016082568181770", "lat": 21.2984663, "lng": -157.8204149}
{"rowid": 33, "narrative": "The facility is comprised of enclosures and a roof that are in critical disrepair. Some gates have openings with\nprotruding wires, feeders are falling apart, with exposed nails protruding, and the roof where the ewes are is actively\nshedding corroded pieces of corrugated metal, with broken pieces on the ground, and others threatening to fall from\nabove. These elements have sharp edges and falling pieces which present a risk of injury to the animals. The gates\nand fencing in disrepair also present an escape risk.\nThe facility must be constructed of such material and of such strength as appropriate for the animals involved. The\nindoor and outdoor housing facilities shall be structurally sound and shall be maintained in good repair to protect the\nanimals from injury and to contain the animals. The facility should make necessary repairs or relocate the animals.", "desc": "FACILITIES, GENERAL.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "724fb26767db47d7", "label": "724fb26767db47d7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-07-19", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 30.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 19.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Hawaii At Manoa", "pdf_customer_addr": "2425 Campus Road, Sinclair 10\nHonolulu, HI 96822", "customer_state": "HI", "pdf_site_id": "009", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470249-aphis-inspection-2016082569219244", "lat": 21.2984663, "lng": -157.8204149}
{"rowid": 34, "narrative": "In the animal enclosures and adjoining areas there was an accumulation of discarded materials. One room, within\nan enclosure, had discarded metal items and empty plastic sacs, and another had a bucket of cleaning products\nnext to a pile of containers that appear to be discarded. Just outside another enclosure there was a large pile of\ndiscarded wool on the ground, that was wet and discolored.\nThe premises shall be kept clean and in good repair in order to protect the animals from injury and to facilitate the\nprescribed husbandry practices. Accumulations of trash shall be placed in designated areas and cleared as\nnecessary to protect the health of the animals. The facility should clean up the premises or relocate the animals.\nThis was a new site inspection. No regulated activity shall be conducted at this site until it is brought into compliance\nand approved.\nThis inspection was conducted with the site herdsman, and the exit interview was conducted with the University of\nHawaii representatives.", "desc": "SANITATION.", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "724fb26767db47d7", "label": "724fb26767db47d7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-07-19", "code": "3.131(c)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 30.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 19.0, "pdf_customer_name": "University Of Hawaii At Manoa", "pdf_customer_addr": "2425 Campus Road, Sinclair 10\nHonolulu, HI 96822", "customer_state": "HI", "pdf_site_id": "009", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470249-aphis-inspection-2016082569219244", "lat": 21.2984663, "lng": -157.8204149}
{"rowid": 35, "narrative": "The USDA Annual Report filed for Fiscal Year 2021 incorrectly accounts for the pigs. The number of pigs used in\nresearch/teaching was stated in column C (no pain, distress or use of pain-relieving drugs) instead of the correct column\nD (accompanying pain or distress to the animals for which appropriate anesthetic, analgesic or tranquilizing drugs were\nused). The pigs were used in surgical procedures.\nProperly identifying animals used in research on the annual report is necessary to inform the Institutional Official and\nUSDA Animal Care of the scope and extent of the animal use at the facility.\nThe 2021 annual report needs to be amended and resubmitted to USDA Animal Care with all animal use data accurately\nincluded. Correct by July 31, 2022.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with the IACUC representative.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Annual report.", "web_siteName": "COLLEGE OF MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "5f648df2aded7e07", "label": "5f648df2aded7e07"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-06-15", "code": "2.36(b)(6)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 29.0, "pdf_customer_name": "UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE - CHATTANOOGA", "pdf_customer_addr": "975 EAST THIRD ST.\nBOX 339\nCHATTANOOGA, TN 37403", "customer_state": "TN", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470293-aphis-inspection-2016090000797873", "lat": 35.0482996, "lng": -85.29096059999999}
{"rowid": 36, "narrative": "On 13 May 2018, according to the paperwork for American Airlines Waybills 06761646 and 06761300 the\nintermediate handler accepted shipments of kittens where the age on the Health Certificates (dated 11 May 18) is\nonly 7 weeks old. No cat shall be accepted by any intermediate handler or carrier for transportation in commerce\nunless such cat is 8 weeks of age and has been weaned. Per this regulation, all dogs and cats transported in\ncommerce must be at least 8 weeks of age and fully weaned. This facility must take steps to assure that future\nacceptance of all dogs are at the minimum age for the health and safety of the animals.\nCorrect from this day forward.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.", "desc": "MINIMUM AGE REQUIREMENTS.", "web_siteName": "GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "95b50f60687b127b", "label": "95b50f60687b127b"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-08-15", "code": "2.130", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class H - Intermediate Handler", "pdf_customer_id": 31.0, "pdf_customer_name": "General Aviation Terminal Inc", "pdf_customer_addr": "8400 Airport Blvd West Ramp Rd\nMobile, AL 36608", "customer_state": "AL", "pdf_site_id": "SAN", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470299-aphis-inspection-2016082569245802", "lat": 30.6800208, "lng": -88.24911399999999}
{"rowid": 37, "narrative": "A responsible adult was not available to accompany APHIS Officials during the inspection process at 1330 on\n28Aug2023. Email attempts to contact local and regional personnel were not answered within allotted 30 minute wait\nperiod. Inspector departed airport at 1415.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Access and inspection of records and property; submission of itineraries.", "web_siteName": "General Aviation Terminal", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "6901e62167a7a540", "label": "6901e62167a7a540"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-08-29", "code": "2.126(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ATTEMPTED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class H - Intermediate Handler", "pdf_customer_id": 31.0, "pdf_customer_name": "GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL INC", "pdf_customer_addr": "8400 AIRPORT BLVD WEST RAMP RD\nMOBILE, AL 36608", "customer_state": "AL", "pdf_site_id": "RDU", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24004432-aphis-inspection-ins-0000886975", "lat": 30.6800208, "lng": -88.24911399999999}
{"rowid": 38, "narrative": "The facility's registration expired 09/01/23. The facility representative stated that they were not aware of the expiration\ndate.\nA current and active registration is necessary to transport regulated species to be in compliance with the Animal Welfare\nAct and Regulations. Each carrier or handler who handles covered animals shall ensure they are registered with USDA by\ncompleting and filing a properly executed form and that the registration is updated every 3 years by the completion and\nfiling of a new registration form.\nAirwaybill # 001-79932204 shows that one (1) Live dog, a Golden Retriever, age 8 weeks, was shipped on 10/12/2023 on\nflight # 2463 from Chicago O\u2019 Hare International Airport to Sacramento International Airport. At approximately 1330 hours\non October 12, 2023, a GAT cargo employee was observed handling the above-mentioned dog.\nNo regulated activities may be conducted until a USDA registration is obtained.", "desc": "Requirements and procedures.", "web_siteName": "GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "b07ab964cab011cc", "label": "b07ab964cab011cc"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-10-12", "code": "2.25(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class H - Intermediate Handler", "pdf_customer_id": 31.0, "pdf_customer_name": "General Aviation Terminal Inc", "pdf_customer_addr": "8400 AIRPORT BLVD WEST RAMP RD\nMOBILE, AL 36608", "customer_state": "AL", "pdf_site_id": "SMF", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24229042-aphis-inspection-ins-0000903102", "lat": 30.6800208, "lng": -88.24911399999999}
{"rowid": 39, "narrative": "At the cargo office for General Aviation Terminal, two cats had been accepted for transport on waybill # 173-07836920, on\na flight bound for Honolulu. The shipment date on the waybill was 04/10/2023. APHIS form 7001 was signed by the\nissuing veterinarian on 3/29/2023. There are twelve (12) days between the veterinarian health certificate and the waybill.\nIntermediate handlers must ensure that the Health Certificate issued by a licensed veterinarian is in accordance with\nparagraph (a) referencing article (2.78 (a)(1) and is issued on a specified date which shall not be more than 10 days from\nthe initial issuance of the Health Certificate\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted in the cargo area with the ground handler.\nAdditional Inspectors:\nKATHARINE FRANK, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER n", "desc": "Health certification and identification.", "web_siteName": "GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "b07ab964cab011cc", "label": "b07ab964cab011cc"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-10-12", "code": "2.78(c)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class H - Intermediate Handler", "pdf_customer_id": 31.0, "pdf_customer_name": "General Aviation Terminal Inc", "pdf_customer_addr": "8400 AIRPORT BLVD WEST RAMP RD\nMOBILE, AL 36608", "customer_state": "AL", "pdf_site_id": "SMF", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24229042-aphis-inspection-ins-0000903102", "lat": 30.6800208, "lng": -88.24911399999999}
{"rowid": 40, "narrative": "The facility's registration expired 09/01/23. The facility representative stated that they were not aware of the expiration\ndate.\nA current and active registration is necessary to transport regulated species to be in compliance with the Animal Welfare\nAct and Regulations. Each carrier or handler who handles covered animals shall ensure they are registered with USDA by\ncompleting and filing a properly executed form and that the registration is updated every 3 years by the completion and\nfiling of a new registration form.\nAirwaybill # 001-79932204 shows that one (1) Live dog, a Golden Retriever, age 8 weeks, was shipped on 10/12/2023 on\nflight # 2463 from Chicago O\u2019 Hare International Airport to Sacramento International Airport. At approximately 1330 hours\non October 12, 2023, a GAT cargo employee was observed handling the above-mentioned dog.\nNo regulated activities may be conducted until a USDA registration is obtained.", "desc": "Requirements and procedures.", "web_siteName": "GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "7f1484f703800b0f", "label": "7f1484f703800b0f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-10-12", "code": "2.25(a)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class H - Intermediate Handler", "pdf_customer_id": 31.0, "pdf_customer_name": "General Aviation Terminal Inc", "pdf_customer_addr": "8400 AIRPORT BLVD WEST RAMP RD\nMOBILE, AL 36608", "customer_state": "AL", "pdf_site_id": "SMF", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24358025-aphis-inspection-ins-0000913256", "lat": 30.6800208, "lng": -88.24911399999999}
{"rowid": 41, "narrative": "At the cargo office for General Aviation Terminal, two cats had been accepted for transport on waybill # 173-07836920, on\na flight bound for Honolulu. The shipment date on the waybill was 04/10/2023. APHIS form 7001 was signed by the\nissuing veterinarian on 3/29/2023. There are twelve (12) days between the veterinarian health certificate and the waybill.\nIntermediate handlers must ensure that the Health Certificate issued by a licensed veterinarian is in accordance with\nparagraph (a) referencing article (2.78 (a)(1) and is issued on a specified date which shall not be more than 10 days from\nthe initial issuance of the Health Certificate\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted in the cargo area with\nthe cargo handler.\nAdditional Inspectors:\nKATHARINE FRANK, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER n", "desc": "Health certification and identification.", "web_siteName": "GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "7f1484f703800b0f", "label": "7f1484f703800b0f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-10-12", "code": "2.78(c)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class H - Intermediate Handler", "pdf_customer_id": 31.0, "pdf_customer_name": "General Aviation Terminal Inc", "pdf_customer_addr": "8400 AIRPORT BLVD WEST RAMP RD\nMOBILE, AL 36608", "customer_state": "AL", "pdf_site_id": "SMF", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24358025-aphis-inspection-ins-0000913256", "lat": 30.6800208, "lng": -88.24911399999999}
{"rowid": 42, "narrative": "There was no one available during business hours to allow APHIS Officials to enter and inspect the facilities,\nproperty, records, and animals on29-JAN-18 at 1:30 PM.\nThe inspector arrived on campus at 1:30 PM on 1/29/18 to conduct an inspection but the individual authorized to\naccompany the inspector was not in his/her office. The inspector waited for almost 60 minutes and tried to contact\nhim/her by both phone and e-mail before leaving. An email received after the inspector left the premises confirmed\nthat the contact had left the campus and was unavailable.\nAn AWA compliance inspection could not be conducted because there was no other authorized facility\nrepresentative available to accompany the inspector.\nUnannounced inspections to determine compliance with the provisions of the AWA are required to assess the\nfacility.\nCorrect from this date forward.\nNOTE - This is the FIRST attempted inspection. Report delivered by e-mail 1/30/18.", "desc": "MISCELLANEOUS.", "web_siteName": "ANIMAL BEHAVIOR LABORATORY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "cc62b529f5954e12", "label": "cc62b529f5954e12"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2018-01-29", "code": "2.38(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ATTEMPTED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": null, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 39.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Connecticut College", "pdf_customer_addr": "270 Mohegan Avenue\nNew London, CT 06320", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470323-aphis-inspection-2016082569030949", "lat": 41.3797744, "lng": -72.1081272}
{"rowid": 43, "narrative": "Proposals to conduct an activity on animals.\n1. Review of Protocol # 100598-0116: There was a discrepancy noted between the monitoring procedures outlined\nin the IACUC approved protocol and the situation observed by the APHIS inspector at the time of the inspection.\nThe protocol states that \"Rabbits are monitored following anesthesia until alert.....\" but during the inspection the\nAPHIS inspector observed a Rabbit in its primary enclosure that was unconscious and in lateral recumbency. No\none was in the room with the Rabbit and its medical record indicated that the animal had received an injection of an\nanesthetic a little over 2 hours ago and an injection of an analgesic less than \u00bd hour ago; both of the medications\nhad been administered by research personnel.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, a proposal for animal use must contain a description of the procedures\ndesigned to assure that any discomfort and pain to animals will be limited to that which is unavoidable for the\nconduct of scientifically valuable research, including provisions for the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing\ndrugs where indicated and appropriate. Research personnel are expected to follow animal use procedures as they\nare described in the IACUC approved protocol.\nThe IACUC needs to address the discrepancy identified for this ongoing IACUC approved research proposal.\nCorrect by 8/21/14.", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "89d0e6b89eab1ed7", "label": "89d0e6b89eab1ed7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-07-17", "code": "2.31(e)(4)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 30.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 44.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Uconn Health Center", "pdf_customer_addr": "263 Farmington Avenue\nFarmington, CT 06030", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470329-aphis-inspection-152142130127750", "lat": 41.7344559, "lng": -72.7956006}
{"rowid": 44, "narrative": "Adequate Pre and Post Procedural Care.\n1. At the time of the inspection just before 10 AM on 7/17/14, the APHIS inspector observed a Rabbit in an\nenclosure that was unconscious and in lateral recumbency. Review of the medical record at the same time\nrevealed that the Rabbit had received an injection of anesthetic at 7:38 AM and an injection of analgesic at 9:30 AM\nunder Protocol #100598-0116; both injections had been given by someone from the investigator's lab. The written\nmedical record had been initialed by the same lab person and the medical record already had entries written for 2\nmore doses of analgesic, one for 7/17/14 at 5PM and the other for 7 AM the next day.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, every research facility shall establish and maintain a program of adequate\nveterinary care that includes adequate pre and post procedural care in accordance with current established\nveterinary medical and nursing procedures. Making entries for treatments or medications in an animal's medical\nrecord before the treatments or medications have been administered to the animal is not in accordance with current\nprofessionally accepted veterinary medical practices.\nThe research facility needs to: (1) address this issue with research personnel on Protocol #100598-0116, and (2)\nensure that all research facility personnel involved in animal care, treatment, and use are familiar with and follow\nthis Section of the Regulations.\nCorrect (1) by 7/28/14 and (2) by 8/22/14.\nNOTE - Inspection conducted 7/17/14 and 7/21/14. Exit interview held 7/21/14 on-site with facility representatives.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "89d0e6b89eab1ed7", "label": "89d0e6b89eab1ed7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-07-17", "code": "2.33(b)(5)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 30.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 44.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Uconn Health Center", "pdf_customer_addr": "263 Farmington Avenue\nFarmington, CT 06030", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470329-aphis-inspection-152142130127750", "lat": 41.7344559, "lng": -72.7956006}
{"rowid": 45, "narrative": "Training of personnel.\n1. It was noted when GP #98 was examined during the inspection, that all of the animal(cid:25)'s toe nails were\nexcessively long when compared to the length of the toe nails of the other 3 GPs housed in the same room. The\nanimal moved normally and none of the toe nails were damaged. The GPs are regularly handled by facility\npersonnel whenever the primary enclosures are changed and according to the room log, the enclosure of GP #98\nhas been changed 3 times per week for at least the past month.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, all personnel involved in animal care should be appropriately trained in the\nproper handling and care for the species of animals that they care for. The excessive length of the toe nails of GP\n#98 should have been recognized by facility personnel at the time of direct handling of the GP during routine cage\nchanges and the toe nails trimmed accordingly. Excessively long nails can be associated with discomfort and can\nbe prone to injury.\nAlthough this item was corrected by facility personnel during the inspection by trimming the long toe nails of GP\n#98, the Registrant needs to ensure that all personnel involved in animal care are familiar with the proper care and\nhandling of the species of animals that they care for and are familiar with the normal physical and behavioral\ncharacteristics of those species so that any deviations from normal are promptly recognized and appropriately\naddressed.\nCorrect by 5/22/15.", "desc": "PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS.", "web_siteName": "CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "e21987931c7f320e", "label": "e21987931c7f320e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-04-22", "code": "2.32(c)(1)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 36.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 44.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Uconn Health Center", "pdf_customer_addr": "263 Farmington Avenue\nFarmington, CT 06030", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470331-aphis-inspection-113150030130010", "lat": 41.7344559, "lng": -72.7956006}
{"rowid": 46, "narrative": "Availability of appropriate equipment.\n1. On 9/3/14 a rabbit died while under general anesthesia for an IACUC approved research activity when the\nventilator abruptly malfunctioned. The rabbit experienced serious respiratory effects and died despite the\nimmediate efforts of the AV to resuscitate the animal.\nThe unexpected death of the rabbit during general anesthesia was reported to the IACUC by the investigator the\nfollowing day. As a result of being informed of the rabbit's unexpected death, the IACUC conducted an investigation\nand concluded that the failure of the ventilator was the result of: (1) the failure of veterinary staff to perform any\nroutine maintenance of the ventilator as recommended by the manufacturer since the unit was purchased in\nOctober 2008; and (2) a 24 volt power supply cord was used with the unit during the general anesthesia of the\nrabbit instead of the 12 volt power supply cord supplied by the manufacturer and the subsequent overvoltage likely\ndamaged components of the ventilator contributing to failure of the unit.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, the program of veterinary care at research facilities should include the\navailability of appropriate facilities and equipment to comply with the provision of adequate veterinary care to the\nanimals. The availability of appropriate equipment includes ensuring that any equipment required for the care and\nuse of the animals that are used in approved research activities is functioning properly, personnel are familiar with\nthe proper use and maintenance of the equipment, and the equipment is maintained and serviced according to the\nmanufacturer's recommendations to ensure that the equipment operates reliably and as expected.\nThe IACUC acted to address this item by conducting an investigation, reporting the incident to OLAW and USDA,\nand implementing appropriate corrective actions to prevent any future incidents. Corrective actions included but\nwere not limited to requiring the performance of and documentation of all routine preventative maintenance of\nequipment as per manufacturer'(cid:25)s recommendations as well as the review of that documentation by the IACUC\nduring every semi-annual facility inspection, tethering the power supply cord that comes with all equipment to each\npiece of equipment, and providing all veterinary technical staff with additional training on the proper use and\nmaintenance of the new ventilator unit.\nThis item has been corrected.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "e21987931c7f320e", "label": "e21987931c7f320e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-04-22", "code": "2.33(b)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 36.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 44.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Uconn Health Center", "pdf_customer_addr": "263 Farmington Avenue\nFarmington, CT 06030", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470331-aphis-inspection-113150030130010", "lat": 41.7344559, "lng": -72.7956006}
{"rowid": 47, "narrative": "Cleaning of primary enclosures.\n1. It was noted during the inspection that most of the corn cob bedding material inside the solid floor primary\nenclosure of GP #98 was very wet and there was a minimal amount of dry bedding material present compared to\nthe other 3 primary enclosures in the room that each contained one GP. In addition the enclosure for GP #98 had a\nstrong ammonia odor and an excessive amount of fecal material compared to the 3 other GP primary enclosures.\nThe skin of the caudal aspect of the hock and metatarsal area of both rear legs of GP #98 was a deeper shade of\npink compared to the skin of the other 3 GPs but there were not any clinical problems noted in the animal.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, GPs should be transferred to a clean enclosure whenever their primary\nenclosure become wet or soiled to a degree that might be uncomfortable or harmful to the health of the animal.\nAlthough this item was immediately corrected by facility personnel during the inspection by transferring GP #98 to a\nclean enclosure, the Registrant needs to ensure that facility personnel monitor the conditions of and change GP\nenclosures on a schedule that prevents the enclosures from becoming excessively soiled or wet.\nCorrect from this date forward.\nNOTE - Inspection conducted 4/22/15 and 4/23/15. Exit interview held 4/23/15 on-site with facility representatives.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "SANITATION.", "web_siteName": "CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "e21987931c7f320e", "label": "e21987931c7f320e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-04-22", "code": "3.31(a)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 36.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 44.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Uconn Health Center", "pdf_customer_addr": "263 Farmington Avenue\nFarmington, CT 06030", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470331-aphis-inspection-113150030130010", "lat": 41.7344559, "lng": -72.7956006}
{"rowid": 48, "narrative": "IACUC approved Protocol #0624 did not provide a written narrative description of the methods and sources used to\ndetermine that alternatives were not available for the non-survival major operative procedure that may cause more than\nmomentary pain or distress to the animals that is included in the protocol.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, whenever a proposal for animal use contains procedures that may cause more than\nmomentary pain or distress to the animals, the IACUC shall determine that the principal investigator has considered\nalternatives to those procedures and that the principal investigator has provided a written narrative description of the\nmethods and sources used to determine that alternatives were not available. This requirement ensures that all procedures\ncontained in the protocol minimize discomfort, distress, and pain to the animals. The IACUC needs to address this item.\nCorrect by 9/19/22.\nThis inspection and exit briefing were conducted with facility representatives.\nn", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "70d69a71697a7f5e", "label": "70d69a71697a7f5e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-08-16", "code": "2.31(d)(1)(ii)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 30.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 44.0, "pdf_customer_name": "UCONN HEALTH CENTER", "pdf_customer_addr": "263 FARMINGTON AVENUE\nFARMINGTON, CT 06030", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470339-aphis-inspection-ins-0000808565", "lat": 41.7344559, "lng": -72.7956006}
{"rowid": 49, "narrative": "Pertaining to IACUC approved Protocol 200794: The proposal for animal use was reviewed along with the medical\nrecords for 13 rabbits on the study. The following instances of the laboratory staff implementing significant changes in an\nongoing activity without prior review and approval by the IACUC and instances of the laboratory staff not following the\napproved protocol were identified. The deviations with the IACUC approved protocol were identified by the IACUC during\nthe November 2023 semi-annual facility inspection.\n1. According to the research facility\u2019s IACUC Acclimation Policy that investigators are to follow for all IACUC approved\nprotocols, the acclimation period for all non-rodents is a minimum of 7 days. Review of facility records for the 6 rabbits\ndelivered on 11/16/23 revealed that the 6 rabbits underwent a procedure requiring anesthesia on 11/17/23 (1 day of\nacclimation) and 1 rabbit delivered on 12/7/23 underwent a procedure requiring anesthesia on 12/12/23 (5 days of\nacclimation). Shortening of the acclimation period is a significant change regarding the use of animals in an ongoing\nactivity that was not reviewed or approved by the IACUC committee.\n2. Protocol states that two injections of the study compound will be administered to the rabbits. The first injection will be\nadministered on study day 0 and the second injection of the study compound will be administered three days later on\nstudy day 3. Review of the medical record of rabbit #448 revealed that the study day 0 injection was administered on\n12/29/23 and the second injection was administered 6 days later on 1/4/24. Doubling the time interval between study\ncompound injections is a significant change regarding the use of animals in an ongoing activity that was not reviewed or\napproved by the IACUC committee.\n3. Protocol states that the intra-articular injection will be performed under general anesthesia (acepromazine followed by\ninhalant agent). There was no documentation noted in the review of the medical records of 10 animals that the inhalant\nagent was administered during the injections as described in the approved protocol.\n4. Protocol states that laboratory staff will monitor the rabbits \u201c5 days per week until the prescribed study endpoint\u201d\nfollowing the intra-articular injections and following the major operative procedure. There was no documentation noted in\nthe review of the medical records of at least 10 animals that the monitoring of the animals was performed as described in\nthe approved protocol.\n5. Protocol states that rabbits undergoing a major operative procedure will receive antibiotics for 3 days post-operatively.\nThere was no documentation noted in the review of the medical records of 5 animals that underwent surgery that\nantibiotics were administered as described in the approved protocol.\n6. Protocol states that acepromazine will be administered prior to procedures either as the sole agent or in addition to an\ninhalant agent, and the protocol includes an approved range for the dose. The dose of acepromazine administered to the\nrabbits was not documented in the medical records and it could not be determined if the dose of the medication was as\ndescribed in the approved protocol.\n7. Protocol states that \u201cno more than 10 ml of blood at each bleeding\u201d. The volume of blood taken was not documented in\nthe medical records for the majority of the blood draws and it could not be determined if the volume of blood taken was as\ndescribed in the approved protocol.\nPer this Section, with respect to activities involving animals, the IACUC shall review and approve, require modifications to\nsecure approval, or withhold approval of proposed significant changes regarding the care and use of animals in ongoing\nactivities prior to implementation by the investigator. Principal investigators are to follow the IACUC approved proposals\nand any proposed changes shall be reviewed and approved by the IACUC prior to implementation. The IACUC needs to\naddress the deviations with the IACUC approved protocol that were identified for this proposal for animal use and ensure\nthat all significant changes regarding the care and use of animals in ongoing activities are reviewed and approved prior to\nimplementation. Correct by 3/1/24.\nThis inspection and exit briefing were conducted with facility representatives.\n*END OF REPORT*\nn", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE MEDICINE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "b2f26b5a807cff86", "label": "b2f26b5a807cff86"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2024-01-29", "code": "2.31(c)(7)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 61.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 44.0, "pdf_customer_name": "UCONN Health Center", "pdf_customer_addr": "263 FARMINGTON AVENUE\nFARMINGTON, CT 06030", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24449794-aphis-inspection-ins-0000923485", "lat": 41.7344559, "lng": -72.7956006}
{"rowid": 50, "narrative": "In April 2021, the Attending Veterinarian was reviewing surgical records of voles with telemetry devices implanted for\nbehavior studies. Upon reviewing the records, the Attending Veterinarian identified 11 voles that had gone through the\ntelemetry implant surgery from March 30th to April 2nd. According to the IACUC approved protocol, only 8 voles were\nsupposed to be used. The Principal Investigator had not submitted an amendment to the IACUC for this change in\nanimals.\nProposed activities and proposed significant changes in ongoing activities that have been approved by the IACUC may be\nsubject to further review and approval. Any changes in activity that involves the care and use of animals must be\napproved by the IACUC.\nThis was corrected at the time of inspection by the Attending Veterinarian retraining the Principal Investigator and the\nIACUC approving an amendment to increase animal numbers.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with Attending Veterinarian.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "842352fe70a26487", "label": "842352fe70a26487"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-02-01", "code": "2.31(d)(8)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 350.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 45.0, "pdf_customer_name": "UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE", "pdf_customer_addr": "79 E DELAWARE AVENUE\nNEWARK, DE 19711", "customer_state": "DE", "pdf_site_id": "002", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470353-aphis-inspection-2016090000767938", "lat": 39.6819421, "lng": -75.7501065}
{"rowid": 51, "narrative": "Report to the Institutional Official.\n1. The IACUC did not update the reports to the Institutional Official at least once every six months as required per\nthis Section of the Regulations. The IACUC did complete the semi-annual reviews of the research facility's program\nfor humane care and use of animals and did complete the semi-annual inspections of the animal facilities on\n10/15/13, 4/22/14, and 10/1/14. However, the IACUC has not prepared a report to the Institutional Official for any of\nthe semi-annual reviews that were completed on those 3 dates. The most recent semi-annual report prepared by\nthe IACUC that was submitted to the Institutional Official was dated 4/22/13 for the semi-annual evaluations\ncompleted by the IACUC in April 2013.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, the IACUC shall evaluate the program for humane care and use of animals and\ninspect the animal facilities semi-annually and then submit a report to the Institutional Official. The reports shall be\nupdated at least once every six months upon completion of the required semi-annual evaluations and must contain\nany minority views. In addition, the reports shall be reviewed and signed by a majority of the IACUC members and\nshall be maintained by the research facility and made available to APHIS for inspection.\nThe IACUC needs to prepare reports for the semi-annual evaluations of the program for humane care and use of\nanimals and the semi-annual animal facility inspections that were conducted by the IACUC on 10/15/13, 4/22/14,\nand 10/1/14 and the reports need to be submitted to the Institutional Official.\nCorrect by 4/10/15.", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "048d23cf993f85a1", "label": "048d23cf993f85a1"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-02-04", "code": "2.31(c)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 152.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 46.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Quinnipiac University", "pdf_customer_addr": "275 Mount Carmel Avenue\nHamden, CT 06518", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470354-aphis-inspection-35151908220098", "lat": 41.4197818, "lng": -72.8915502}
{"rowid": 52, "narrative": "Continuing reviews of activities involving animals.\n1. Pertaining to Protocol A-3: The IACUC did not conduct a continuing review of this animal use protocol at an\ninterval of at least annually as required per this Section. The protocol was initially reviewed and approved by the\nIACUC on 1/16/13 and the next continuing review of the protocol was conducted by the IACUC on 4/22/14. This\nrepresents an interval of 15 months between continuing reviews.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, the IACUC shall conduct continuing reviews of animal use activities at\nappropriate intervals as determined by the IACUC, but not less than annually. Regular continuing reviews of\napproved animal use activities by the IACUC is important to ensure that all aspects of the animal use proposal\nremain compliant with the requirements of the AWA Regulations.\nNOTE - Exit interview held 2/6/15 on-site with facility representative.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "048d23cf993f85a1", "label": "048d23cf993f85a1"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-02-04", "code": "2.31(d)(5)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 152.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 46.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Quinnipiac University", "pdf_customer_addr": "275 Mount Carmel Avenue\nHamden, CT 06518", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470354-aphis-inspection-35151908220098", "lat": 41.4197818, "lng": -72.8915502}
{"rowid": 53, "narrative": "IACUC Functions.\n1. The IACUC has not conducted an evaluation of the research facility's program for humane care and use of\nanimals and has not inspected the research facility's animal facilities at least once every six months as required.\nThe date of the last evaluation of the program and inspection of the animal facilities was 10/1/14. As of the date of\ntoday's inspection, it has been almost 7 1/2 months since the IACUC completed the last evaluations and it was also\nnoted that the IACUC had not yet scheduled a date to conduct the required evaluations of the program and animal\nfacilities.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, the IACUC is responsible for conducting the semi-annual evaluations of the\nprogram for humane use and inspection of the animal facilities. Completion of these required evaluations by the\nIACUC is important to assess both the program for animal use and the condition of the animal facilities to evaluate\nand ensure that the research facility is adhering to the standards and regulations specified under the Act.\nNOTE - This was a focused inspection based on the non-compliant items identified during the last inspection.\nNOTE - Exit interview held 5/12/15 on-site with facility representative. Report delivered by e-mail 5/13/15.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "5fbcb888fbc24ffe", "label": "5fbcb888fbc24ffe"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-05-12", "code": "2.31(c)(3)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 152.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 46.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Quinnipiac University", "pdf_customer_addr": "275 Mount Carmel Avenue\nHamden, CT 06518", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470355-aphis-inspection-133152009570591", "lat": 41.4197818, "lng": -72.8915502}
{"rowid": 54, "narrative": "Recordkeeping for Reports to Institutional Official.\n1. There was no copy of the semi-annual IACUC report to the Institutional Official (IO) available for review at time of\nthe inspection for the report submitted to the IO for the semi-annual review of the Program for Animal Care and Use\nand the semi-annual inspection of the animal facilities that were conducted by the IACUC in the Fall of 2015.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, copies of the semi-annual reports prepared by the IACUC and submitted to the\nIO should be maintained and available at the time of an inspection so the required records can be reviewed to\ndetermine the compliance of the research facility with the provisions of the AWA.\nCorrect from this date forward for all past and future IACUC semi-annual reports to the Institutional Official.\nNOTE - Exit interview held on-site 3/31/16 with facility representative. Report delivered by e-mail 4/4/16.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS.", "web_siteName": "QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "dd83c72e0a3d02ce", "label": "dd83c72e0a3d02ce"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-03-31", "code": "2.35(a)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 126.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 46.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Quinnipiac University", "pdf_customer_addr": "275 Mount Carmel Avenue\nHamden, CT 06518", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470357-aphis-inspection-91161959010611", "lat": 41.4197818, "lng": -72.8915502}
{"rowid": 55, "narrative": "There was no one available during business hours to allow APHIS Officials to enter and inspect the facilities,\nproperty, records, and animals on29-JAN-20 at 1:15 PM.\nThe inspector arrived on campus at 1:15 PM on 1/29/20 to conduct an inspection but the individual authorized to\naccompany the inspector was not in his/her office. The inspector tried to contact him/her by text messages and\nwaited for almost 60 minutes before leaving.\nAn AWA compliance inspection could not be conducted because there was no other authorized facility\nrepresentative available to accompany the inspector.\nUnannounced inspections to determine compliance with the provisions of the AWA are required to assess the\nfacility.\nCorrect from this date forward by providing inspector with alternate points of contact and schedule of availability.\nNOTE - This is the FIRST attempted inspection. Report delivered by e-mail 1/30/20.", "desc": "MISCELLANEOUS.", "web_siteName": "QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "40c497f8e3fbf7b3", "label": "40c497f8e3fbf7b3"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2020-01-29", "code": "2.38(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ATTEMPTED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 46.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Quinnipiac University", "pdf_customer_addr": "275 Mount Carmel Avenue\nHamden, CT 06518", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470361-aphis-inspection-2016082569711787", "lat": 41.4197818, "lng": -72.8915502}
{"rowid": 56, "narrative": "Proposals to conduct activities involving animals.\n1. Review of Protocol #2013-07653: There are several inconsistencies and/or incomplete descriptions of the\nproposed use of the study animals contained in the text of the protocol that was reviewed and approved by the\nIACUC.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, a proposal for animal use must contain a complete description of the proposed\nuse of the animals so the IACUC can determine that the components of the activities related to the care and\nproposed use of animals activities are in accordance with the requirements as outlined in this subchapter.\nThe IACUC needs to address these issues as identified for this research proposal.\nCorrect by 8/1/14.", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "894a62b876276a9c", "label": "894a62b876276a9c"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-06-23", "code": "2.31(e)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 364.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 48.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Yale University", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Research Admin\nPo Box 208327\nNew Haven, CT 06520", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470368-aphis-inspection-170142253399416", "lat": 41.3064267, "lng": -72.9310217}
{"rowid": 57, "narrative": "Watering.\n1. At the end of May 2014, two single-housed Peromyscus mice were found dead in their enclosures several days\nfollowing complete cage change. It was later determined that the Peromyscus died as a result of employee error\nwhen their enclosures were placed onto an automatic water-equipped rack incorrectly and as a result the animals\ndid not have access to any water.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, water must be provided to animals as often as necessary for the health and\ncomfort of the animal. The lack of access to sufficient amounts of water can have adverse effects on the health and\nwell-being of the animals.\nIn response to this incident and to prevent any future incidents, the institution took corrective actions including but\nnot limited to providing re-training of husbandry staff on the standard operating procedures for daily cage checks\nand daily animal health checks.\nThis item has been appropriately addressed by the research facility.\nNOTE - Inspection conducted 6/23/14 through 6/26/14. Exit interview held 6/26/14 on-site with facility\nrepresentatives.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "WATERING.", "web_siteName": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "894a62b876276a9c", "label": "894a62b876276a9c"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-06-23", "code": "3.130", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 364.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 48.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Yale University", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Research Admin\nPo Box 208327\nNew Haven, CT 06520", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470368-aphis-inspection-170142253399416", "lat": 41.3064267, "lng": -72.9310217}
{"rowid": 58, "narrative": "Handling.\n1. On 11/9/12 husbandry staff found a loose hamster on the floor of the dirty side of the cage wash room.\nVeterinary staff assessed the hamster and humanely euthanized the animal. Upon being notified and in response\nto this incident, the IACUC determined that the hamster had been administered an experimental agent on 11/7/12\nand further concluded that a member of the laboratory staff was responsible for the events that led to the hamster\nbeing found loose in the dirty side of the cage wash room.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, handling of animals by all personnel, including laboratory staff, shall be done as\ncarefully as possible in a manner that does not cause behavioral stress or unnecessary discomfort.\nThe IACUC acted promptly to address this item by conducting an investigation, reporting the incident to OLAW, and\nswiftly implementing appropriate corrective actions to prevent any future incidents.\nItem has been corrected.\nNOTE - This was a focused inspection. Exit interview held 2/26/15 on-site with facility representatives.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "MISCELLANEOUS.", "web_siteName": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "214206e6b2bcbbc2", "label": "214206e6b2bcbbc2"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-02-26", "code": "2.38(f)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 48.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Yale University", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Research Admin\nPo Box 208327\nNew Haven, CT 06520", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470369-aphis-inspection-56151520260573", "lat": 41.3064267, "lng": -72.9310217}
{"rowid": 59, "narrative": "Consideration of Alternatives.\n**Protocol #7113 includes a procedure that would be considered more than momentarily painful or distressful but\nthe protocol approved by the IACUC did not contain a written narrative description of the methods and sources used\nto determine that alternatives were not available to that procedure.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, whenever a proposal for animal use contains procedures that may cause more\nthan momentary pain or distress to the animals, the investigator is required to consider alternatives to those\nprocedures and provide a written narrative description of the methods and sources used to determine that\nalternatives were not available. This requirement is important to ensure that all procedures minimize the degree of\npain and distress to the animals.\nThe IACUC needs to address this deficiency that was identified for this protocol.\nCorrect by 7/1/17.", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "669c88cb0f341522", "label": "669c88cb0f341522"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-05-15", "code": "2.31(d)(1)(ii)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 288.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 48.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Yale University", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Research Admin\nPo Box 208327\nNew Haven, CT 06520", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470372-aphis-inspection-2016082568289161", "lat": 41.3064267, "lng": -72.9310217}
{"rowid": 60, "narrative": "Program of Veterinary Care.\n**The following outdated medications were found in an investigator\u2019s laboratory space that were ready for use on an\nAWA covered species: one tube of Lidocaine cream exp date 1/17 and one tube of Triple Antibiotic ointment exp\ndate 4/17.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, each research facility shall establish and maintain programs of adequate\nveterinary care that include the use of appropriate methods to prevent and treat diseases and injuries. All personnel\ninvolved in animal care and use at the research facility should follow the guidelines of the institution\u2019s Program of\nVeterinary Care (PVC) that states in part that expired drugs are not approved for use in survival procedures. The\nuse of outdated or expired medications may not be safe or efficacious; medications that are past their expiration\ndate can deteriorate with time and may not result in the intended therapeutic effects in the animals.\nAlthough the expired medications were immediately discarded at the time of the inspection, the research facility\nneeds to ensure that all personnel who are involved in animal care, including research staff, are familiar with the\ninstitution\u2019s PVC and the requirement to use in-date medications in the animals. Following the institution\u2019s Program\nof Veterinary Care ensures that appropriate methods are used by all personnel to prevent and treat diseases or\ninjuries in order to support the health and well-being of the animals.\nCorrect by 7/1/17.\nNOTE - Inspection conducted 5/15/17 thru 5/17/17 with exit briefing held 5/18/17 on-site with facility\nrepresentatives.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "669c88cb0f341522", "label": "669c88cb0f341522"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-05-15", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 288.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 48.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Yale University", "pdf_customer_addr": "Office Of Research Admin\nPo Box 208327\nNew Haven, CT 06520", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470372-aphis-inspection-2016082568289161", "lat": 41.3064267, "lng": -72.9310217}
{"rowid": 61, "narrative": "In February 2021 laboratory staff for Protocol #07941 reported an unexpected study outcome to the IACUC. The IACUC\nconducted an investigation and determined that although prior instruction had been provided to laboratory staff, they did\nnot follow the IACUC approved protocol and also did not follow at least 2 of the institution\u2019s guidelines related to animal\nuse.\nA lower dose of anesthetic than in the approved protocol was administered to the animals and as a result the animals did\nnot remain at a level of anesthesia to allow initiation of the second scheduled procedure. Laboratory staff decided to\nperform the 2nd procedure later the same day after a second administration of anesthesia, which was not described in the\nIACUC approved protocol.\nPer this Section, it shall be the responsibility of the research facility to ensure that all scientists, research technicians,\nanimal technicians, and other personnel involved in animal care, treatment, and use are qualified to perform their duties.\nThe research facility had addressed this item prior to this inspection by providing supplemental refresher training to\nlaboratory personnel on the need to follow the IACUC approved protocol and institutional guidelines. There have been no\nadditional related incidents. Corrected prior to inspection.\nThis inspection was conducted with facility representatives from 7/12/21 through 7/15/21. The exit briefing was held with\nfacility representatives on 7/15/21.\n*END OF REPORT*\nEnd Section", "desc": "Personnel qualifications.", "web_siteName": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "78961d4d643df2f5", "label": "78961d4d643df2f5"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-07-12", "code": "2.32(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 641.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 48.0, "pdf_customer_name": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "pdf_customer_addr": "OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMIN\nPO BOX 208327\nNEW HAVEN, CT 06520", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470377-aphis-inspection-2016090000659676", "lat": 41.3064267, "lng": -72.9310217}
{"rowid": 62, "narrative": "Pertaining to IACUC approved Protocol 20100: On 4/21/23 rabbit #87 was anesthetized by investigator staff for an IACUC\napproved operative procedure using injectable agents followed by an inhalant agent at 2% for maintenance anesthesia.\nThe animal\u2019s heart rate began to increase during the procedure and the investigator staff increased the percentage of\ninhalant agent to 3% for 30 minutes. The heart rate remained elevated and the investigator decided to administer an\nadditional dose of the injectable agents, kept the inhalant agent at 3%, and continued the study procedure. The rabbit\u2019s\nheart rate remained elevated, but the investigator staff did not contact the Attending Veterinarian. The inhalant agent was\ndiscontinued when the procedure was completed, constituting over 4 hours inhalant anesthesia and over 2 hours at 3%,\nbut the rabbit\u2019s oxygen level began to drop, and respiratory depression developed. At that point, investigator staff\ncontacted veterinary staff who immediately responded and initiated treatment. The animal\u2019s condition continued to\ndeteriorate, and the rabbit was euthanized. The necropsy results were that the death was due to anesthesia error.\nPer this Section, each research facility shall maintain a program of adequate veterinary care that includes the observation\nof all animals to assess their health and well-being. The observation of animals may be accomplished by someone other\nthan the Attending Veterinarian (AV). However, a mechanism of direct and frequent communication must be in place to\nconvey timely and accurate information concerning any problems of animal health observed in the animals to the\nAttending Veterinarian who has the authority to ensure that the animals are provided adequate veterinary care.\nThere was a failure of the investigator staff to contact the AV during the operative procedure when there was a problem of\nanimal health. The Attending Veterinarian and research facility acted promptly to address this incident and implemented\ncorrective measures prior to this inspection, which included additional training of the investigator staff, modifications to the\nproposal for animal use, and requiring that veterinary staff administer anesthesia. There have been no additional\nincidents. To remain corrected from this day 3/22/24 forward.\nThis inspection was conducted with facility representatives from 3/18/24 through 3/22/24. The exit briefing was held with\nfacility representatives on 3/22/24.\nn", "desc": "Attending veterinarian and adequate veterinary care.", "web_siteName": "YALE UNIVERSITY", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "7c8eed2e5934da8c", "label": "7c8eed2e5934da8c"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2024-03-18", "code": "2.33(b)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 499.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 48.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Yale University", "pdf_customer_addr": "OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMIN\nPO BOX 208327\nNEW HAVEN, CT 06520", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24557171-aphis-inspection-ins-0000948505", "lat": 41.3064267, "lng": -72.9310217}
{"rowid": 63, "narrative": "During the review of the semi-annual reports to the Institutional Official, it was noted that the IACUC updated the Semi-\nannual Report on 2/8/22 and the next update to the report was on 10/4/22, an interval of 8 months between reports\ninstead of at least once every 6 months.\nPer this Section, one of the functions of the IACUC is to prepare reports of the Committee\u2019s semi-annual evaluations of\nthe program for animal use and its inspection of the facilities; the semi-annual reports to the Institutional Official shall be\nupdated at least once every six months upon completion of the required semiannual evaluations. This process ensures\nthat the Institutional Official is kept informed of the status of both the animal use program and the research facilities.\nCorrect from this date 10/14/22 for all future semi-annual reports to the Institutional Official.\nThis inspection and exit briefing were conducted with facility representatives.\n*END OF REPORT*\nn", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "ANIMAL RESEARCH FACILITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "4c0ebd56182fff84", "label": "4c0ebd56182fff84"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-10-13", "code": "2.31(c)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 3.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 51.0, "pdf_customer_name": "HARTFORD HOSPITAL", "pdf_customer_addr": "DIR., PRECLINICAL RES. DEPT, CRANE 4,\n80 SEYMOUR STREET, P O BOX 5037\nHARTFORD, CT 06102", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470388-aphis-inspection-ins-0000821229", "lat": 41.752536, "lng": -72.6802372}
{"rowid": 64, "narrative": "Review of IACUC approved protocol #9-075: The written narrative description of the methods and sources used to\ndetermine that alternatives were not available to the procedures that may cause more than momentary pain or distress to\nthe animals that are included in the proposal, refers to the use of a database search to determine there are no suitable\nalternatives. However, none of the terms used in the database search strategy pertained to the specific surgical\nprocedures contained in the proposal (such as laparotomy, thoracotomy).\nPer this Section, whenever a proposal for animal use contains procedures that may cause more than momentary pain or\ndistress to the animals, the IACUC shall determine that (1) the principal investigator has considered alternatives to those\nprocedures and (2) that the written narrative description of the methods and sources used by the principal investigator to\ndetermine that alternatives were not available adequately addresses all of the potentially painful procedures contained in\nthe proposal. These requirements ensure that all procedures contained in the protocol minimize discomfort, distress, and\npain to the animals. The IACUC needs to address this item identified for this protocol. Correct by 1/16/24.\nThis inspection and exit briefing were conducted with facility representatives.\n*END OF REPORT*\nn", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "ANIMAL RESEARCH FACILITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "48c560ffd875ad9f", "label": "48c560ffd875ad9f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-12-12", "code": "2.31(d)(1)(ii)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 51.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Hartford Hospital", "pdf_customer_addr": "DIR., PRECLINICAL RES. DEPT, CRANE 4, 80 SEYMOUR S\nBOX 5037\nHARTFORD, CT 06102", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24359109-aphis-inspection-ins-0000913283", "lat": 41.7100811, "lng": -72.8805326}
{"rowid": 65, "narrative": "The USDA reviewed the facility's records for the 5-year-old whale, Havok, during the time he was on 24-hour watch.\nDuring the eight hours prior to his death, the staff members conducting the overnight watch documented multiple\nobservations of abnormal behavior and did not alert the Attending Veterinarian. The frequency of these abnormal\nbehaviors markedly increased during this time compared to what had been observed previously.\nFrom 0000-2150 on the day prior to Havok\u2019s death, about 40 instances of a combination of \u201clogging,\u201d shaking of pectoral\nflippers, \u201cventral up\u201d and rolling behaviors were noted at the facility in various time intervals. Comparatively, during\nHavok\u2019s last eight hours 2151-0550, the facility's records noted at least 40 instances of 360 rolling, with one instance of\nfour rolling behaviors noted at 0049 hours and five rolling behaviors noted at 0146 hours. Other abnormal behaviors\nnoted to increase in frequency were at least 15 instances of \"ventral up\u201d (most of note was the instance of ventral up for\n15 seconds at 0101 hours), 3 instances of \"gaspy\" respirations beginning at 0413 hours, and 7 instances of water seen\ncoming from his blowhole beginning at 0416 hours. There were also 10 instances of \"active bleeding\u201d from Havok's\nrostrum recorded during the two hours prior to his death.\nThis increased frequency of abnormal behaviors constitutes a problem; can indicate rapid deterioration of the animal\u2019s\nhealth and may result in prolonged distress. Although staff members were recording their observations of Havok\u2019s\nbehaviors, the veterinarian was not contacted during this eight-hour timeframe until Havok\u2019s death at 0550 hours.\nThe facility failed to provide adequate veterinary care by not using appropriate methods to prevent, control, diagnose and\ntreat diseases during Havok\u2019 s last eight hours.\nCorrect from this date 10/15/21 forward.", "desc": "Attending veterinarian and adequate veterinary care (dealers and exhibitors).", "web_siteName": "Mystic Life Aquarium", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a", "label": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-09-29", "code": "2.40(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 4.0, "web_certType": "Class C - Exhibitor", "pdf_customer_id": 56.0, "pdf_customer_name": "SEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC", "pdf_customer_addr": "55 COOGAN BLVD.\nMYSTIC, CT 06355", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470414-aphis-inspection-2016090000763425", "lat": 41.3732621, "lng": -71.9535228}
{"rowid": 66, "narrative": "The new whales were first given access to the older resident whales and the main pool in the habitat on 6/18/21. Facility\nrecords indicated that the five-year-old whale named Havok had been receiving treatment for over two weeks for an\nocular condition that resulted in compromised vision. On 6/20/21, the gates between the three interconnecting pools were\nopen allowing the eight whales access to all pools. A visitor dropped a foreign object in the main pool, which according to\nfacility employees, is not unexpected when there are a lot of visitors present at the exhibits.\nAccording to facility employees, in response to the foreign object, they closed the gate to the holding pool. The facility\nstationed other whales, but not Havok. A facility employee attempted to retrieve the object with a net. Per the facility,\nHavok was startled by the net in the main pool and then swam towards the holding pool after the gate was shut. Although\nthe facility has applied dark hatch markings on the clear acrylic gate, Havok swam straight into the gate. According to\nfacility records, Havok was \u201cshut on main (pool), rammed gate to holding pool, re-opened rostrum wounds and new\nwound on upper left mandible.\u201d Results of the veterinarians' examination noted trauma sustained when he hit the gate\nincluded the presence of lacerations on the maxillary palate and the pre-existing wound on his rostrum re-opened and\nexpanded.\nHandling of all animals shall be done in a manner that does not cause physical harm. Foreign objects falling into exhibits\nfrom members of the public is an anticipated occurrence. The handling of the whales during the response to the foreign\nobject falling into the pool was not done as carefully as possible to ensure the safety of all the animals, including Havok\nwho had known vision impairment, a history of swimming into habitat walls, and a disposition for being \u201cspooked,\u201d per his\nbehavioral records and previous facility\u2019s medical records.\nCorrect from this date 10/15/21 forward.", "desc": "Handling of animals.", "web_siteName": "Mystic Life Aquarium", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a", "label": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-09-29", "code": "2.131(b)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 4.0, "web_certType": "Class C - Exhibitor", "pdf_customer_id": 56.0, "pdf_customer_name": "SEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC", "pdf_customer_addr": "55 COOGAN BLVD.\nMYSTIC, CT 06355", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470414-aphis-inspection-2016090000763425", "lat": 41.3732621, "lng": -71.9535228}
{"rowid": 67, "narrative": "The USDA reviewed the facility\u2019s records for the 5-year-old whale named Havok which contained multiple entries\ndocumenting injuries the animal sustained on the surfaces of the primary enclosure housing him. On 6/23/21 he injured\nhimself on an area in the medical pool where the posts for the hydraulic mechanism are located. This incident resulted in\na 4\u201dx 4\u201d round full thickness wound to the right caudal peduncle that required ongoing treatment. On 7/12/21 \u201cstaff note\nthat whale appears to have reduced vision, often colliding with habitat wall and sustained rostral and fluke abrasions\u201d.\nIndoor and outdoor housing facilities for marine mammals must be structurally sound and must be maintained in good\nrepair to protect the animals from injury.\nCorrect from this date 10/15/21 forward.", "desc": "Facilities, general.", "web_siteName": "Mystic Life Aquarium", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a", "label": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-09-29", "code": "3.101(a)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 4.0, "web_certType": "Class C - Exhibitor", "pdf_customer_id": 56.0, "pdf_customer_name": "SEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC", "pdf_customer_addr": "55 COOGAN BLVD.\nMYSTIC, CT 06355", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470414-aphis-inspection-2016090000763425", "lat": 41.3732621, "lng": -71.9535228}
{"rowid": 68, "narrative": "The USDA inspectors were at the holding pool inspecting where 3 belugas are currently being housed. The USDA noted\nthat there are times during the day when the holding pool lacked sufficient shelter to protect the animals from direct\nsunlight. Although the building adjacent to the holding pool provides shade to parts of the pool at varying times during the\nday, there was no natural or artificial shelter available that provided the animals a consistent source of shade. Records\nmaintained by the facility for the 5 new whales contained entries for the application of sunscreen from 6/11/21 through\n9/28/21. Havok\u2019s medical record included an entry on 7/12/21 that described the presence of solar dermatitis with skin\nulceration surrounding the blowhole and solar dermatitis on his melon and cranial dorsum. Records also document that\nthe five whales have eye issues which can be exacerbated by direct sunlight. These conditions can be painful for the\nanimals and may require treatment.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, marine mammals that are kept outdoors shall be provided protection from the weather\nor from direct sunlight. Exposure to direct sunlight can adversely affect the animals\u2019 health resulting in eye or skin\ndamage.\nCorrect by 12/15/21", "desc": "Facilities, outdoor.", "web_siteName": "Mystic Life Aquarium", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a", "label": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-09-29", "code": "3.103(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 4.0, "web_certType": "Class C - Exhibitor", "pdf_customer_id": 56.0, "pdf_customer_name": "SEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC", "pdf_customer_addr": "55 COOGAN BLVD.\nMYSTIC, CT 06355", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470414-aphis-inspection-2016090000763425", "lat": 41.3732621, "lng": -71.9535228}
{"rowid": 69, "narrative": "From 7/31/21 to 8/27/21 the recorded levels of ORP (Oxidative Reduction Potential), a measure of ozone in the water\nwhere the animals live, ranged between 476 and 715mV which is above the levels generally considered to be acceptable\nfor marine mammals. There were eight consecutive days during this time period when the level ranged from 553 to 606.\nORP levels that exceed 500mV can suggest that animals may be exposed to high oxidant levels in their pool and require\nimmediate attention by marine mammal facilities. Elevated levels of oxidants in the water, such as ozone, are harmful to\nmarine mammals and may cause irritation to eyes, skin, and the respiratory system. Per this Section of the Regulations\nthe primary enclosure shall not contain water which would be detrimental to the health of the marine mammal contained\ntherein.\nThis item was addressed by the facility prior to the inspection.\nThis inspection was conducted with facility representatives and NOAA personnel on 9/29/21 and 9/30/21.\nThe exit briefing was held 10/12/21 with facility representatives.\nAdditional Inspectors:\nTonya Hadjis, Supervisory Animal Care Specialist\nCarolyn McKinnie, Senior Veterinary Medical Officer - Marine Mammals and ExoticsEnd Section", "desc": "Water quality.", "web_siteName": "Mystic Life Aquarium", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a", "label": "5fe3dcd7d2670c4a"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-09-29", "code": "3.106(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 4.0, "web_certType": "Class C - Exhibitor", "pdf_customer_id": 56.0, "pdf_customer_name": "SEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC", "pdf_customer_addr": "55 COOGAN BLVD.\nMYSTIC, CT 06355", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470414-aphis-inspection-2016090000763425", "lat": 41.3732621, "lng": -71.9535228}
{"rowid": 70, "narrative": "Water quality records for the AASC pools 1 and 2 housing whales Jetta (Pool 1) and Havana (Pool 2) were reviewed.\nBoth of these whales are under veterinary care. There were multiple instances of consecutive days in December 2021\nwhen the coliform bacteria count of water samples of the pools far exceeded 1,000 MPN. In Pool 1 from 11/30/21 to\n12/25/21 (26 days) there were only 6 days where the coliforms were measured under 1000 MPN (3 of those values were\nin the 900\u2019s) and 5 days of coliform values over 10,000 MPN. In Pool 2 from 11/30/21 until 12/30/21 (31 days) there were\n16 days of high coliform counts with values on 4 of those days over 19,000 MPN and only 4 days where the coliform\nlevels were under 1000 MPN\nDuring this same time period, there are entries in Havana\u2019s medical record documenting instances of keratitis,\nblepharospasm, inappetence, GI discomfort, and rubbing the skin of her fluke and rostrum on the sides of the pool. The\nentry in her medical record for 12/8/21 after consultation with an ophthalmologist, states that \u201ccoliform changes may have\ncontributed to keratopathy, so plan to work with the LSS/WQ team (life support system/water quality) to mitigate even\nsmall fluctuations\u201d.\nPer this Section of the Regulations the primary enclosure shall not contain water which would be detrimental to the health\nof the marine mammal contained therein. Elevated levels of coliforms and other indicators of water quality, such as\noxidants in the water, are harmful to marine mammals and may cause irritation to eyes, skin, and the respiratory system.", "desc": "Water quality.", "web_siteName": "Mystic Life Aquarium", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "3b9ca4df4492bf35", "label": "3b9ca4df4492bf35"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-01-10", "code": "3.106(a)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 31.0, "web_certType": "Class C - Exhibitor", "pdf_customer_id": 56.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Sea Research Foundation Inc", "pdf_customer_addr": "55 Coogan Blvd.\nMystic, CT 06355", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470415-aphis-inspection-2016090000775355", "lat": 41.3732621, "lng": -71.9535228}
{"rowid": 71, "narrative": "**Water quality records for the two AASC pools were reviewed. There were two instances in December 2021 when the\ncoliform bacteria count of water samples for both pools exceeded 1,000 MPN and the next water sample recorded was\nmore than 48 hrs later. The coliform count exceeded 1,000 MPN on 12/16/21 and the next recorded coliform count was\n96 hrs later on 12/20/21, and the coliform count exceeded 1,000 MPN on 12/21/21 and the next recorded coliform count\nwas 72 hrs later on 12/24/21.\n**Coliform tests for AASC Pool 1 conducted on 10/2/21 and 12/5/21, and the coliform test for AASC Pool 2 conducted on\n12/4/21 had values of \u201c>24,196\u201d MPN. These results do not reflect the actual coliform bacteria counts because there is a\n\u201c>\u201d (greater than) sign in front of the number which indicates that the result exceeded the limit of the testing method used.\nNo other testing was done on these dates to determine the actual coliform count.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, the coliform bacteria count of the primary enclosure pool shall not exceed 1,000 MPN\n(most probable number) per 100 ml. of water. Should a coliform bacterial count exceed 1,000 MPN, two subsequent\nsamples may be taken at 48-hour intervals and averaged with the first sample. If such average count does not fall below\n1,000 MPN, then the water in the pool shall be deemed unsatisfactory, and the condition must be corrected immediately.\nCorrect from this date 1/14/22 forward.\nThis inspection was conducted with facility representatives on 1/10/22. The exit briefing was held 1/14/22 with facility\nrepresentatives.\n*END OF REPORT*\nAdditional Inspectors:\nTonya Hadjis, Supervisory Animal Care SpecialistEnd Section", "desc": "Water quality.", "web_siteName": "Mystic Life Aquarium", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "3b9ca4df4492bf35", "label": "3b9ca4df4492bf35"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-01-10", "code": "3.106(b)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 31.0, "web_certType": "Class C - Exhibitor", "pdf_customer_id": 56.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Sea Research Foundation Inc", "pdf_customer_addr": "55 Coogan Blvd.\nMystic, CT 06355", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470415-aphis-inspection-2016090000775355", "lat": 41.3732621, "lng": -71.9535228}
{"rowid": 72, "narrative": "1. The 2 guinea pig restraint devices were constructed with a top made of wire mesh and a floor made of wood.\nThe outermost layer of the wood had worn off of approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of the floor\u2019s surface exposing the\nunderlying particle board wood. The exposed particle board wood areas of the floor of both restrainers appeared\nthicker than the rest of the floor where the outermost layer was intact. The thickened appearance of the exposed\nparticle board wood indicates that the wood had adsorbed liquid or moisture.\nPer this Section of the Regulations, enclosures used to house guinea pigs shall be constructed of material\nsubstantially impervious to liquids and moisture. Surfaces that are not impervious to moisture cannot be effectively\ncleaned or sanitized which can affect the health of the animals.\nThe floors of the 2 guinea pig restrainers need to be replaced with a material impervious to moisture.\nCorrect by 11/23/16.\nNOTE \u2013 Exit briefing held on-site 11/9/16 with facility representatives. Report delivered by e-mail 11/10/16.\n*END OF REPORT*", "desc": "PRIMARY ENCLOSURES.", "web_siteName": "SLATE BLDG & BRITTON BLDG", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "c5e4e53ed9f86b3f", "label": "c5e4e53ed9f86b3f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-11-09", "code": "3.28(a)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 2.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 61.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The C T Agriculture Experiment Station", "pdf_customer_addr": "123 Huntington Street\nBox 1106\nNew Haven, CT 06504", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "002", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470450-aphis-inspection-2016082568002588", "lat": 41.3306425, "lng": -72.9199874}
{"rowid": 73, "narrative": "During the review of the Semi-annual Reports to the Institutional Official (IO), it was noted that:\n1. The semi-annual Program reviews conducted by the IACUC in 3/22, 10/22, and 3/23 identified that the research\nfacility\u2019s Contingency Plan had been prepared in November 2013 and needed to be updated. However, the deficiency did\nnot have a specific plan and schedule with dates for correction and the deficiency was not categorized as minor or\nsignificant on the three Reports to the IO.\n2. The semi-annual Facility inspections of site 001 in 10/22 and 3/23 were conducted by one IACUC member (Attending\nVeterinarian) and one other person who was not a member of the IACUC.\n3. The 3/22, 10/22, and 3/23 Semi-annual Reports to the Institutional Official were not signed by a majority of the IACUC\nmembers.\nPer this Section, one of the functions of the IACUC is to prepare reports of the Committee\u2019s semi-annual evaluations of\nthe program for animal use and its inspection of the facilities. The report must contain a reasonable and specific plan and\nschedule with dates for correcting each deficiency. The IACUC may use subcommittees composed of at least two\nCommittee members and may invite ad hoc consultants to assist in conducting the evaluations, however, the IACUC\nremains responsible for the evaluations and reports as required by the Act and regulations. The reports shall be reviewed\nand signed by a majority of the IACUC members. This process ensures that the Institutional Official is kept informed and\nprovided with accurate information on the status of both the animal use program and the research facilities.\nCorrect from this date 3/24/23 for all future semi-annual reports to the Institutional Official.", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "SLATE BLDG & BRITTON BLDG", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "903b6fdd74607552", "label": "903b6fdd74607552"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-03-23", "code": "2.31(c)(3)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 61.0, "pdf_customer_name": "THE C T AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION", "pdf_customer_addr": "123 HUNTINGTON STREET\nBOX 1106\nNEW HAVEN, CT 06504", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "002", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23785784-aphis-inspection-ins-0000859452", "lat": 41.3306425, "lng": -72.9199874}
{"rowid": 74, "narrative": "During the review of the research facility\u2019s USDA FY 22 Annual Report, it was noted that no rabbits were reported.\nHowever at the time of the 3/16/22 inspection, there were 2 rabbits at site 001.\nPer this Section, the USDA Annual Report shall state the common names and the numbers of animals upon which\nteaching, research, experiments, or tests were conducted that involved no pain, distress, or use of pain-relieving drugs.\nRoutine procedures (for example injections, tattooing, blood sampling) should be reported with this group. The USDA\nAnnual Report documents a research facility\u2019s animal use activities and the animal usage during the federal fiscal year\n(October 1 through September 30); the species and number of animals should be accurate. The research facility needs to\nsubmit a revised annual report to USDA by 4/7/23.\nThis inspection and exit briefing were conducted with facility representative.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Annual report.", "web_siteName": "SLATE BLDG & BRITTON BLDG", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "903b6fdd74607552", "label": "903b6fdd74607552"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-03-23", "code": "2.36(b)(5)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 61.0, "pdf_customer_name": "THE C T AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION", "pdf_customer_addr": "123 HUNTINGTON STREET\nBOX 1106\nNEW HAVEN, CT 06504", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "002", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23785784-aphis-inspection-ins-0000859452", "lat": 41.3306425, "lng": -72.9199874}
{"rowid": 75, "narrative": "During the review of the most recent Semi-annual Report submitted to the Institutional Official (IO) dated 10/18/23, it was\nnoted that the report was not signed by a majority of the IACUC members.\nPer this Section, one of the functions of the IACUC is to prepare reports of the Committee\u2019s semi-annual evaluations of\nthe program for animal use and its inspection of the facilities. The reports shall be reviewed and signed by a majority of\nthe IACUC members prior to being submitted to the IO. This process ensures that all members of the IACUC Committee\nhave an opportunity to review the report and to include any minority views to ensure that the IO is kept informed and\nprovided with accurate information on the status of both the animal use program and the research facilities.\nThis inspection and exit briefing were conducted with facility representatives.\n*END OF REPORT*\nn", "desc": "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "SLATE BLDG & BRITTON BLDG", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "a8b0260e67575635", "label": "a8b0260e67575635"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2024-02-20", "code": "2.31(c)(3)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 0.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 61.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The CT Agriculture Experiment Station", "pdf_customer_addr": "123 HUNTINGTON STREET\nBOX 1106\nNEW HAVEN, CT 06504", "customer_state": "CT", "pdf_site_id": "002", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24493611-aphis-inspection-ins-0000928332", "lat": 41.3306425, "lng": -72.9199874}
{"rowid": 76, "narrative": "Surgical records for Pig #9 used under study A conducted on September 15, 2021, show inconsistencies in the monitoring\nof vital signs and missing information. The pig was under anesthesia for approximately 18hrs. Either no vital signs were\nrecorded or only some monitoring parameters were noted in the records at some timepoints.\nBased upon the information on the Anesthesia and Vital Signs Monitoring form:\n1. There were no vital signs entered at the 8:15pm and 8:30pm and timepoints\n2. No entries of PCO2 from 2:45pm-6:15pm and the CO2 monitor was not working for an unspecified amount of time.\n3. No blood pressure readings for the noon-2:00pm timepoints and the 7:30pm-11:15pm timepoints\nNoted in the surgical records was an incident in which the tracheal tube was noted to have filled with phlegm at 2:45am.\nAppropriate interventions were administered but Pig #9 ultimately died under anesthesia because of a decline of its vital\nsigns and O2 desaturation. Records indicate the EtCO2 ranged from 21- 35 mm Hg from 7:55am to 2am. The EtCO2\nvalue was out of range except between 11pm \u2013 2am. (The protocol indicates the EtCO2 would be monitored and\nmaintained at 40 +/- 5.) The pO2 was within normal range until 2:45am when phlegm was noted in the tracheal tube.\nPersonnel responsible for monitoring the pig #9 under anesthesia missed timepoints for monitoring as indicated in the\nprotocol and facility SOPs and failed to recognize in a timely manner that the animal was not being adequately\noxygenated as outlined in the study protocol.\nThe protocol indicates the principal investigator will provide training and that inexperienced personnel will be under the\ndirection of the principal investigator or senior investigators. Personnel were not following the guidelines for monitoring\nand interventions outlined in the protocol. Some personnel involved in the study are not adequately trained in the process\nand interpretation of monitoring of all vital signs as indicated in the facility surgery records.\nAn appropriate training program must be implemented that ensures all persons on the study are properly trained to\nperform the necessary procedures and is knowledgeable of monitoring parameters of vital signs as outlined in the\nprotocol and in surgical documents. This training must occur before any additional procedures are performed under for\nthe welfare of the animals on Protocol A. Correct by October 18, 2021.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with the Attending Veterinarian and Institutional Official.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Personnel qualifications.", "web_siteName": "WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "1ddf2549574ec9ae", "label": "1ddf2549574ec9ae"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-09-17", "code": "2.32(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 1.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 66.0, "pdf_customer_name": "MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE", "pdf_customer_addr": "GEORGE HYMAN MEM.RESEARCH BLDG RM 126\n108 IRVING STREET NW\nWASHINGTON, DC 20010", "customer_state": "DC", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470502-aphis-inspection-2016090000752055", "lat": 38.9311048, "lng": -77.01423009999999}
{"rowid": 77, "narrative": "Several technicians performing procedures under Protocol A were trained between March 2022 and July 2022. According\nto their training qualification section of the protocol, some of the sub-investigators will perform procedures \u201cunder the\nguidance of and learning from senor investigators\u201d. There was no indication a senior investigator was present for some\nstudies in progress and assistance was sought from the vet staff or others not listed on the protocol.\nAdditionally, there is no record of a process that ensures that sub-investigators with limited experience with the species\nand/or procedures on the study are reevaluated to determine proficiency to perform study procedures on their own.\nPer this Section, it the responsibility of a research facility to ensure that all scientists, research technicians, animal\ntechnicians, and other personnel involved in a study are qualified to perform the procedures outlined in the protocol. This\nrequirement ensures that processes and procedures established and approved by the IACUC are followed for the welfare\nof the study animals.\nQualifications of personnel must be reviewed with sufficient frequency to ensure all study personnel can perform all study\nprocedures without supervision. A process for determining proficiency in performing procedures on the protocol must be\nestablished and the personnel qualifications should be updated accordingly.\nCorrect by January 31, 2023.\nThe inspection was conducted from 11/16-18/ 2022. This inspection and exit interview were conducted with the facility\nrepresentatives and the IO.\nn", "desc": "Personnel qualifications.", "web_siteName": "WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "03059301405b82ef", "label": "03059301405b82ef"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2022-11-16", "code": "2.32(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 7.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 66.0, "pdf_customer_name": "MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE", "pdf_customer_addr": "GEORGE HYMAN MEM.RESEARCH BLDG RM 126\n108 IRVING STREET NW\nWASHINGTON, DC 20010", "customer_state": "DC", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23581450-aphis-inspection-ins-0000826678", "lat": 38.9311048, "lng": -77.01423009999999}
{"rowid": 78, "narrative": "*Two fly strips above the treatment stall for the goats were full of flies. There were some cobwebs attached to the\nback and sides of the stall.\nDebris from older fly strips and cobwebs could allow for contamination of equipment during procedures or while\nroutinely handling the animals. In addition, as weather warms, fly strips that are full may not adequately control flies.\nPremises shall be kept clean in order to protect the animals from injury.\nCorrected at time of inspection.\nThe inspection and exit briefing were conducted with the President.", "desc": "SANITATION.", "web_siteName": "BUSHOVER'S BIOLOGICALS, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "1ea558fb6f511ae0", "label": "1ea558fb6f511ae0"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-04-14", "code": "3.131(c)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 130.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 68.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Bushover'S Biologicals, Inc.", "pdf_customer_addr": "Cross Hill Road\n992 Cross Hill Road\nVassalboro, ME 04989", "customer_state": "ME", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470507-aphis-inspection-105151729574543", "lat": 44.3962793, "lng": -69.64576439999999}
{"rowid": 79, "narrative": "Multiple small areas areas associated with seams along the metal lining on the wall of the goat pen were rusted and\npeeling up away from the wall, creating roughened edges with the potential for goats to rub against and pull apart further.\nIf the metal wall liners are not kept in good repair, there is a potential for animal injury. The facility must ensure that the\nfacility is structurally sound and maintained in good repair to protect the animals from injury.\nTo be corrected by: August 10, 2021\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representative.\nEnd Section", "desc": "Facilities, general.", "web_siteName": "BUSHOVER'S BIOLOGICALS, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "08ba0ed985a26dfc", "label": "08ba0ed985a26dfc"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-07-27", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 66.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 68.0, "pdf_customer_name": "BUSHOVER'S BIOLOGICALS, INC.", "pdf_customer_addr": "992 CROSS HILL ROAD\nVASSALBORO, ME 04989", "customer_state": "ME", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470513-aphis-inspection-2016090000667801", "lat": 44.3962793, "lng": -69.64576439999999}
{"rowid": 80, "narrative": "The chainlink fence surrounding the outdoor goat pen was sagging and detached from several of the upright supports,\nwith some exposed sharp edges of wire along the bottom edge on one side. Sagging fence may fail to contain the\nanimals adequately, and the sharp edges of wire could present a risk for injury. The facility must ensure the fence\nsecurely and safely contains the animals.\nCorrect by 30 May 2023.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with the facility representative.\nn", "desc": "Facilities, general.", "web_siteName": "BUSHOVER'S BIOLOGICALS, INC.", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "b0049aa2d05edd2f", "label": "b0049aa2d05edd2f"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-05-09", "code": "3.125(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 53.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 68.0, "pdf_customer_name": "BUSHOVER'S BIOLOGICALS, INC.", "pdf_customer_addr": "992 CROSS HILL ROAD\nVASSALBORO, ME 04989", "customer_state": "ME", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23837737-aphis-inspection-ins-0000868585", "lat": 44.3962793, "lng": -69.64576439999999}
{"rowid": 81, "narrative": "***The corrective action plan for an adverse event that occurred on January 22, 2014, included a change in the\nprocess for sexing hamsters at weaning. The IACUC review of the adverse event did not include a verification that\nformal training of the change in process had occurred. Additonally, there is no formal written document of the new\nprocedure.The IACUC must verify that a corrective action plan as a result of an adverse event has been\nimplemented to ensure there is no repeat of the adverse event. The IACUC must ensure that the new process for\nsexing hamsters is in writing, either by protocol admendment or an SOP, and that all pertinent personnel have\nreceived the required training. Correct by March 20, 2015", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ed2776cebb5d5cdd", "label": "ed2776cebb5d5cdd"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-03-10", "code": "2.31(c)(4)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 50.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 70.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The George Washington University", "pdf_customer_addr": "2300 Eye St Nw\nAnml Res Fac.,Ross B-12\nWashington, DC 20037", "customer_state": "DC", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470525-aphis-inspection-69150654510826", "lat": 38.9012681, "lng": -77.04095830000001}
{"rowid": 82, "narrative": "***On January 22, 2014 five hamster pups were found dead or morbid in a cage containing two males and one\nfemale. The female hamster was missexed and her pregnancy was undetected. The husbandry and research staff\nfailed to properly identify the sex of the female hamster. A new process for ensuring hamsters are properly sexed at\nweaning was established but not formally written. Changes in procedures should be documented in writing and\nformal training provided to all pertinent personnel. The research and husbandry staff must receive training on the\nnew process for sexing hamsters. Additionally, the training should be documented to ensure all personnel are aware\nof the new process. Correct by March 20, 2015\nAn exit briefing was conducted with the facility representatives.\nAdditional Inspectors\nMcintosh Ashley, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS.", "web_siteName": "GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ed2776cebb5d5cdd", "label": "ed2776cebb5d5cdd"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-03-10", "code": "2.32(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 50.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 70.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The George Washington University", "pdf_customer_addr": "2300 Eye St Nw\nAnml Res Fac.,Ross B-12\nWashington, DC 20037", "customer_state": "DC", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470525-aphis-inspection-69150654510826", "lat": 38.9012681, "lng": -77.04095830000001}
{"rowid": 83, "narrative": "Records reviewed did not support the use of appropriate methods to prevent, control, diagnose, and treat diseases\nand injuries. Five out of twelve animal records reviewed at this inspection indicated that treatment was delayed in\nanimals identified to veterinary personnel for evaluation. Treatments, if directed, were not recorded as having been\nperformed. Appropriate and prompt treatment must be initiated and recorded to assure the best outcome for the\nanimals. Additional preventive measures may also be indicated. Correct: This point forward\nAn exit briefing was conducted with the facility veterinarian.\nAdditional Inspectors\nMcfadden Gloria, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE (DEALERS AND EXHIBITORS).", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "d5f99943f12c4741", "label": "d5f99943f12c4741"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-08-20", "code": "2.40(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 390.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470570-aphis-inspection-232141312450418", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 84, "narrative": "Eight Primates (50Y,GM2,47A,96C,72X,51S,40T,78U) were noted to have significant hair loss at the time of\ninspection. The underlying skin in these areas is pigmented, typical for the species but several also had redness of\nthe skin. There is no crusting of the skin or obvious signs of scratching and the animals were not observed hair\nplucking during inspection. The manager speculated about the causes of this hair loss including: that it was due to\nover-grooming for one and likely hormonal for another. She indicated, that in the case of 78U, that the near\ncomplete hair loss had been present for years. Below is a summary of the records reviewed:\n78U -The manager stated that the primate had a long history of diarrhea but was not currently receiving any\ntreatment for the hair loss. Veterinary records indicated that the animal had been evaluated for diarrhea multiple\ntimes but the hairloss was not assessed other than as a Hair Coat Score (HCS) which was Moderate General\nalopecia (3) on 6/2/15 and Bald (5) on 10/6/15. There was no documentation at the facility regarding the hair loss\nand no record of the veterinarian(cid:25)s recommendations regarding this animals hair loss.\n40T - The record showed no workup for hairloss. In the past year, the animal had a wound on the left thigh\n(4/28/15), gave birth (5/29/15), and had a Physical Examination (PE) (10/20/15). On the PE, the animal was noted\nto be Overweight (4) with Severe Generalized alopecia (4) but no treatment plan was noted for either observation.\n51S - The record showed no workup for hairloss. The most recent PE (9/22/15) showed a Body Condition Score\n(BCS) of 3.5/5 (despite the facility using a four point scale instead of five as indicated). The HCS was noted as Mild\nPatchy alopecia (2) No treatment plan was noted.\n72X - The record showed no workup for hairloss. In the past year, the animal had a wound (4/16/15), gave birth\n(6/15/15), had a wound treated on the ventral back (7/15/15), and had a PE (10/20/15). On the PE, the animal was\nnoted to be hypoalbuminemic with Severe Generalized alopecia (4) and diarrhea but no treatment plan was noted\nfor the decreased albumin or the hairloss. The animal was on observation for diarrhea\n50Y, GM2, 47A, 96C Were all noted on their last PE to have a HCS of Mild Patchy alopecia (2) or better despite\nhaving significant hairloss at this inspection.\nAs indicated by the manager's comments, hair loss in primates can result from multiple causes. Evaluation by a\nveterinarian is necessary to determine the most likely cause and develop an appropriate diagnostic and treatment\nplan. Failure to address abnormal conditions can result in worsening of the condition and unnecessary suffering.\nAll licensees must ensure that observations of abnormal conditions are reported to the attending veterinarian in a\ntimely manner and that appropriate methods are used to prevent, control, diagnose, and treat disease when\nidentified. Correct by having all animals with hair loss examined by a licensed veterinarian who will develop\nrecommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Additionally the licensee shall maintain record of this examination,\nthe veterinarian(cid:25)s recommendations, and any treatments for future evaluation by APHIS Officials upon request.\nAn exit briefing was conducted with the facility manager.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE (DEALERS AND EXHIBITORS).", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "d6b4c9ca46399434", "label": "d6b4c9ca46399434"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-10-29", "code": "2.40(b)(2)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 427.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470571-aphis-inspection-302150010300099", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 85, "narrative": "Eight Primates (50Y,GM2,47A,96C,72X,51S,40T,78U) were noted to have significant hair loss at the time of\ninspection 29 October 2015. The underlying skin in these areas was pigmented, typical for the species but several\nalso had redness of the skin. There was no crusting of the skin or obvious signs of scratching and the animals were\nnot observed hair plucking during inspection. The manager speculated about the causes of this hair loss including:\nthat it was due to over-grooming for one and likely hormonal for another. She indicated, that in the case of 78U, that\nthe near complete hair loss had been present for years. Below is a summary of the records reviewed in October\nand January:\n78U -The manager stated that the primate had a long history of diarrhea but was not currently receiving any\ntreatment for the hair loss. Veterinary records indicated that the animal had been evaluated for diarrhea multiple\ntimes but the hairloss was not assessed other than as a Hair Coat Score (HCS) which was Moderate General\nalopecia (3) on 6/2/15 and Bald (5) on 10/6/15. This animal was examined 5 November 2015 and had blood drawn\nfor CBC and blood chemistries. No treatment was outlined pending blood results. The results were recorded 10\nNovember 2015 and indicated hypoalbuminemia with no anemia. The animal was placed on albumin and iron\nsupplementation with a plan to recheck the blood in 1 to 2 months. There was no documentation at the facility\nregarding the hair loss and no record of the veterinarian(cid:25)s recommendations regarding this animals hair loss.\n40T - The record showed no workup for hairloss. In the past year, the animal had a wound on the left thigh\n(4/28/15), gave birth (5/29/15), and had a Physical Examination (PE) (10/20/15). On the PE, the animal was noted\nto be Overweight (4) with Severe Generalized alopecia (4) but no treatment plan was noted for either observation.\nNo further entries were in the record as of 25 January 2016 (this inspection).\n51S - The record showed no workup for hairloss. The most recent PE (9/22/15) showed a Body Condition Score\n(BCS) of 3.5/5 (despite the facility using a four point scale instead of five as indicated). The HCS was noted as Mild\nPatchy alopecia (2) No treatment plan was noted. No further entries were in the record as of 25 January 2016 (this\ninspection).\n72X - The record showed no workup for hairloss. In the past year, the animal had a wound (4/16/15), gave birth\n(6/15/15), had a wound treated on the ventral back (7/15/15), and had a PE (10/20/15). On the PE, the animal was\nnoted to be hypoalbuminemic with Severe Generalized alopecia (4) and diarrhea but no treatment plan was noted\nfor the decreased albumin or the hairloss. The animal was on observation for diarrhea and on 2 November 2015\nwas found to be dehydrated with a BCS of 5 and a HCS of 4. Blood was drawn for CBC and Serum Chemistries and\nthe animal was placed on Tylosin and LRS (fluids). The results of testing revealed hypoalbuminemia with anemia\nand the animal was positive for Aeromonas. Tylan treatment was continued and the animal was returned to the\ncolony15 December 2015. No mention of the alopecia diagnosis or treatment plan was made in the record.\nNone of the four animals detailed on the October 2015 inspection had received a diagnosis or treatment plan\nspecifically for hairloss as of this inspection (25 January 2015) as noted above. The facility did develop an \"Alopecia\nWorkup of Non-human Primates\" plan with workup sheet to be used when examining animals with hairloss. The\nscoring system was updated and a chart posted in the examination rooms. This plan is in place for all future\nexaminations.\nAs indicated by the manager's comments, hair loss in primates can result from multiple causes. Evaluation by a\nveterinarian is necessary to determine the most likely cause and develop an appropriate diagnostic and treatment\nplan. Failure to address abnormal conditions can result in worsening of the condition and unnecessary suffering.\nAll licensees must ensure that observations of abnormal conditions are reported to the attending veterinarian in a\ntimely manner and that appropriate methods are used to prevent, control, diagnose, and treat disease when\nidentified. Correct by having all animals with hair loss examined by a licensed veterinarian who will develop\nrecommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Additionally the licensee shall maintain record of this examination,\nthe veterinarian(cid:25)s recommendations, and any treatments for future evaluation by APHIS Officials upon request.\nAn exit briefing was conducted with the Director of Research Animal Resources.", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE (DEALERS AND EXHIBITORS).", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "7155f9a330d8b7b0", "label": "7155f9a330d8b7b0"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-01-25", "code": "2.40(b)(2)", "repeat": 1, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 427.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470572-aphis-inspection-25161829450049", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 86, "narrative": "During the on-site inspection of animal facilities, it appeared that all nonhuman primates were receiving basic\nenrichment as directed by the environmental enrichment plan. Animals requiring special attention under this section\nwere receiving an extra enrichment device each week. The duration of interaction with this enrichment was less\nthan one day. The success or failure of special attention being provided to these animals was not sufficiently\ndocumented to determine if the special attention was effective, and/or if adjustments were needed to help address\nthe psychological distress. Correct by assessing and documenting the effectiveness of the special attention being\nprovided, and implementing modifications to the environmental enrichment provided to these animals as needed\nand as approved by the attending veterinarian. To be corrected prior to the next inspection.\nAn exit briefing was conducted with the attending veterinarian.\nAdditional Inspectors\nBrandes Robert, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "ENVIRONMENT ENHANCEMENT TO PROMOTE PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING.", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "feb38644f9cc71b9", "label": "feb38644f9cc71b9"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-07-15", "code": "3.81(c)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 448.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470574-aphis-inspection-2016082568010845", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 87, "narrative": "On January 26, 2016 a young female macaque was found dead in the outdoor portion of her enclosure. This animal\nhad its head entrapped in a ball which was used for enrichment in the animal's enclosure. The ball was described\nby the facility as having a hole chewed into it sufficient to allow the entire head of the animal to become entrapped\nwith only the mandible of the jaw exposed. This animal died at some time between the PM and AM animal checks.\nThe necropsy of the animal was not conclusive and the facility determined that the likely cause of death was\nprolonged exposure to the cold in combination with the stress of not being able to remove her head from the ball.\nAt the time of the inspection today the inspectors noted a few badly worn enrichment items. A couple of these\nitems had holes in them. One enrichment item in particular known as a \"pill\" had a hole in it large enough for a\njuvenile macaque to stick its head into. This enrichment item has worn to the point that it is potentially hazardous to\nanimals in the enclosure in which it is being used. Furniture type fixtures or objects must be sturdily constructed\nand strong enough to provide for the safe activity and welfare of the animals in the enclosure. When excessively\nworn these items must be removed from the enclosure in order to minimize the risk of head or other limb\nentrapment.\nCorrected at the time of the inspection.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with various Johns Hopkins University personnel.\nAdditional Inspectors\nMaginnis Gwendalyn, Veterinary Medical Officer\nCohen Kimberley, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "HOUSING FACILITIES, GENERAL.", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "90109895689cf1b0", "label": "90109895689cf1b0"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2017-02-15", "code": "3.75(c)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 450.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470575-aphis-inspection-2016082568104567", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 88, "narrative": "On June 16th 2021, a rhesus macaque was found dead, entrapped in the cable used to open and close the shift door of\nits primary enclosure. According to a facility representative and the facility\u2019s review of the incident, the clasp used to\nsecure the cable and keep the shift door closed may not have been positioned correctly, creating laxity in the cable. The\nanimal, while in its enclosure, was able to get caught in the cable resulting in injury. Primary enclosures must be\nconstructed and maintained so that nonhuman primates are protected from injury.\nThis item was corrected by the IACUC through a temporary and immediate redesign of the door mechanism and\nretraining animal care staff on new husbandry practices. The facility is also in the process of replacing all shift doors with\na new type.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nThis inspection was conducted from 06/17/2021 to 06/21/2021.\nAdditional Inspectors:\nGLORIA MCFADDEN, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICEREnd Section", "desc": "Primary enclosures.", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "9073d48399cb4d7e", "label": "9073d48399cb4d7e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-06-17", "code": "3.80(a)(2)(ii)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 658.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 GARLAND HALL\n3400 N CHARLES STREET\nBALTIMORE, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470578-aphis-inspection-2016090000639436", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 89, "narrative": "On July 30th, 2021 ten rhesus macaques escaped from their primary enclosure and into the hallway of the facility.\nAccording to facility representatives, the animal care staff employee who was cleaning during the incident did not make\nsure the latch of the lock was completely secure. The employee was able to return 9 of the rhesus macaques to their\nprimary enclosure. While returning the macaques to their primary enclosure, one juvenile macaque escaped into an\nuncovered floor drain. The baskets that covered the drain was removed at the time for cleaning.\nThe facility attempted to retrieve the juvenile macaque from the drain, which included digging up the sewer main. The\nmacaque was dead when it was removed from the drain by facility representatives.\nHandling of all animals shall be done as expeditiously and carefully as possible in a manner that does not cause trauma,\nphysical harm, or unnecessary discomfort.\nThis was corrected by the facility through installation of permanent grates over all drains to prevent animals from entering.\nOther appropriate corrective actions were taken, which included retraining of all employees that work with the primates at\nthe facility.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nAdditional Inspectors:\nGLORIA MCFADDEN, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER\nLemnique Wafer, Assistant DirectorEnd Section", "desc": "Handling of animals.", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "b5bc530938262e41", "label": "b5bc530938262e41"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2021-11-15", "code": "2.131(b)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 594.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 GARLAND HALL\n3400 N CHARLES STREET\nBALTIMORE, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470581-aphis-inspection-2016090000748874", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 90, "narrative": "On August 15th, 2023, three animal care staff attempted to move two juvenile rhesus macaques from their primary\nenclosure into a catch cage that was positioned in the staff accessible alleyway. According to facility representatives, the\nmacaques were difficult to shift into the catch cage so the guillotine door was open to allow the primates into the staff\nalleyway. While shifting the animals into the alleyway, the two macaques pushed the entry gate creating a 2.5 inch gap.\nThe gap was large enough for both non-human primates to escape.\nThe three animal care staff immediately notified the veterinarian in charge that the escape occurred. Upon notification, the\nfull animal care staff at the facility and veterinarian implemented a plan to capture the macaques. Additional personnel,\nincluding the behaviorist, were called to the facility for support. The plan to recapture the primates included live traps with\nfresh produce, walks around the perimeter of the facility and personnel stationed at the facility overnight.\nOn August 16th, 2023, one primate was caught by facility staff and taken to be examined by the veterinarian in charge.\nAccording to the veterinarian, the macaque was not sick or injured. On the evening of August 17th, 2023, the second\nmacaque was recovered. According to the veterinarian the macaque was immediately examined. The macaque was not\nsick or injured.\nHousing facilities for nonhuman primates must be designed and constructed so that they are structurally sound for the\nspecies of nonhuman primates housed in them. They must be kept in good repair, and they must protect the animals from\ninjury, contain the animals securely, and restrict other animals from entering.\nCorrected on August 16, 2023 by repairing the alleyway gate.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives.\nAdditional Inspectors:\nGLORIA MCFADDEN, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER n", "desc": "Housing facilities, general.", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "1d4d29b9547046b8", "label": "1d4d29b9547046b8"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2023-08-17", "code": "3.75(a)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 10.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "720 Rutland Avenue\nRoss 459\nBaltimore, MD 21205", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24004433-aphis-inspection-ins-0000885705", "lat": 39.2987632, "lng": -76.59226009999999}
{"rowid": 91, "narrative": "On the morning of February 22, 2024, a pigtail macaque was identified as unresponsive within the outdoor section of the\nsheltered enclosure. The animal care staff and clinical veterinarian responded to the unresponsive macaque, but the\nanimal was already deceased. It was noted by staff that the macaque had gotten its hand stuck in a narrow gap in the\nsteel floor of the enclosure along the edge of the cage frame. An investigation into the incident was completed by the\nACUC and the facility staff following the incident.\nPrimary enclosures must be constructed and maintained so that they protect the nonhuman primates from injury.\nCorrected before the time of inspection by a corrective action plan and welding steel plates along the perimeter of the\nfloors in the outdoor sections of the sheltered enclosures.\nThis inspection and exit interview were conducted with the facility representatives.\nThis inspection was conducted from 4/25-26/2024\nAdditional Inspectors:\nGLORIA MCFADDEN, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER\nJason Sifkarovski, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER n", "desc": "Primary enclosures.", "web_siteName": "The Johns Hopkins University", "kind": "Critical", "hash_id": {"value": "9752be39cbe6e373", "label": "9752be39cbe6e373"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2024-04-25", "code": "3.80(a)(2)(ii)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "FOCUSED INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 584.0, "web_certType": "Class A - Breeder", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "720 Rutland Ave, Ross 459\nBaltimore, MD 21205", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "001", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24705127-aphis-inspection-ins-0000988812", "lat": 39.2987632, "lng": -76.59226009999999}
{"rowid": 92, "narrative": "The principal investigator did not provide a complete written narrative description of the methods and sources used\nto consider alternatives to all procedures that may cause more than momentary or slight pain or distress to the\nanimals in Protocols SW13M393, SW14M181, and RB14M79. In protocol RB14M79 the method chosen was\n\"considered to be a classic method\" and no alternatives were discussed despite their existence. The methods must\nbe clearly shown to be sufficient and identified alternatives must be discussed to assure the IACUC has the\ninformation needed to assure the welfare of the animals. Correct: This point forward\nAn exit interview was conducted with facility representatives and the IACUC Chair.\nAdditional Inspectors\nMcfadden Gloria, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "d0cd70b58b206ce3", "label": "d0cd70b58b206ce3"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2014-08-20", "code": "2.31(d)(1)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 574.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470585-aphis-inspection-232141153270536", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 93, "narrative": "The minutes of IACUC meetings did not include all activities of the Committee, and Committee deliberations as\nrequired. Specifically, adverse events reported to the IACUC were not outlined and there was no indication that the\nmembers concurred with the proposed corrections. The Training and Compliance staff generally gives a verbal\nreport to the IACUC. This report is not outlined in the minutes, not formalized and approved, and not available as a\nwritten document to reviewers. Omissions of this type do not assure that the IACUC members are provided the\nproper notification and oversight for the members to assess the research facility's animal program, facilities, and\nprocedures as required. Additionally, failure to include information regarding deliberations of events with significant\nanimal welfare impacts prevents APHIS Officials from evaluating the facilities response and adherence to the\nAnimal Welfare Act. Each research facility shall maintain IACUC records that include minutes of meetings, records\nof attendance, activities of the Committee, and Committee deliberations. Correct by ensuring that records contain\nrequired information from this point forward.", "desc": "RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7", "label": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-01-28", "code": "2.35(t)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 914.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470586-aphis-inspection-27152206320952", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 94, "narrative": "A rabbit died after being left in its cage which was sent through the autoclave for disinfection prior to regular cage\nwashing. The autoclave begins with a prolonged vacuum cycle that the facility veterinary staff determined caused\nthe animal to die by asphyxiation. The animal caretaker had failed to notice that an animal was present in the cage.\nThe incident was reported immediately and the following corrective actions were taken: The individual responsible\nwas given a warning, the light levels in the room were increased during cage changes, cages must now be slid out\nof the rack when transferring animals, and a second person will now check each cage with a light before placement\nin the autoclave. Staff has been trained on the new procedures. The person handling the cage, and therefore the\nanimal, was in the process of handling. All research facilities must ensure that handling of animals is conducted as\nexpeditiously and carefully as possible in a manner that does not cause trauma , overheating, excessive cooling,\nbehavioral stress, physical harm, or unnecessary discomfort. Corrected by facility before this inspection as\nindicated above.", "desc": "MISCELLANEOUS.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7", "label": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-01-28", "code": "2.38(f)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 914.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470586-aphis-inspection-27152206320952", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 95, "narrative": "A room containing four owl monkeys had a relative humidity reading of 21% on Kestral reading during inspection. A\nreview of the January 2015 room log indicated that humidity had been below 20% every day of the month to date (3\nweeks). A paper posted at the room boldly showed the target humidity to be 40% with a range of 30 to 70%. Indoor\nhousing facilities as defined in 9CFR section 1.1 must be capable of maintaining humidity levels of 30 to 70%. Due\nto the small size of these animals, and their native habitat, a 20% relative humidity is not consistent with a level that\nensures the health and well-being of the animals housed and is not consistent with generally accepted professional\nand husbandry practices. Failure to provide appropriate humidity can result in the development of clinical signs\nincluding coughing, dehydration, and nose-bleeds. While the facility is currently monitoring for these signs,\nintervention would only be provided after the animal had felt the effects related to low humidity. Indoor housing\nfacilities for non-human primates must maintain the relative humidity at a level that ensures the health and\nwell-being of the animals as directed by the attending veterinarian. Additionally, humidity must be maintained at\nlevels in-keeping with generally accepted professional and husbandry practices. Correct By: 13 February 2015", "desc": "INDOOR HOUSING FACILITIES.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7", "label": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-01-28", "code": "3.76(b)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 914.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470586-aphis-inspection-27152206320952", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 96, "narrative": "Five of the 34 primary enclosures for macaques at location 13 had perches added to them for enrichment. These\nextra perches (each cage had a fixed perch) were hung by four(4) chains. Two(2) chains on one end of the perch\nwere 7 links long and the two on the other end were 13 links long. Each link was approximately one inch in length.\nOne of the perches had been flipped over by the primate so that the chains crossed and created four triangular\nholes. The triangles on the 13 link side were large enough to accommodate the head of the primate. All four\ntriangles could accommodate an appendage and might cause entrapment if the perch was flipped again. This\nfacility had two primate deaths that appeared to be by strangulation in chains and were confirmed as asphyxiation\non necropsy. Both of these deaths were reported to OLAW. The first was closed with them 15 January 2014 and the\nsecond was closed with OLAW 26 September 2014. Based on this experience, the facility took measures to remove\nor redesign chain structures in or on primate cages. Long chains were removed or covered in PVC pipe throughout\nthe facility but the Five(5) perches supported by chains at location 13 were not removed or modified. Primary\nenclosures for non-human primates must be constructed and maintained in a manner so that they adequately\nprotect the animals from injury. While enrichment is important for the behavioral health of primates, chains that can\nform loops are known to cause injury to appendages and death by strangulation. Although the facility recognized\nthe ongoing risk of chains, they failed to identify potentially hazardous chains in all housing areas for NHPs. The\nfacility removed all identified potentially hazardous chain devices at the time of inspection. Additionally the facility\nmust ensure that all primary enclosures are maintained in a manner to prevent injury to the animals from this point\nforward.\nAn exit interview was conducted with facility representatives and the IACUC Chair.\nAdditional Inspectors\nMcfadden Gloria, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "PRIMARY ENCLOSURES.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7", "label": "e8f4ebeeb201d1e7"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2015-01-28", "code": "3.80(a)(2)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 914.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470586-aphis-inspection-27152206320952", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 97, "narrative": "Two baboon enclosures had loops of water lines entering the cage from the top at the time of inspection. The\nwaterlines were attached to the source and to the cage at the water nipple. This created a loop of water line\nsufficiently large for the animals to put a head through and possibly cause strangulation. Facility personnel\nimmediately removed the water lines from the enclosure when they were pointed out by USDA personnel and the\nanimal staff was instructed to assure the cages were pulled away from the water line origin to prevent the lines from\nbeing reintroduced to the cages. Two more Baboons had enrichment devices attached to the front of their\nenclosures by a rope that was sufficiently long that it could be pulled into the enclosure (but not the enrichment\ndevice). This would create a loop of rope sufficiently large that a head or limb could be passed through and become\nentrapped. Personnel must ensure that the enclosures in which animals are placed do not contribute to these risks.\nCorrect by ensuring that personnel are properly trained to handle animals and equipment in a manner that takes\ninto account the special capabilities and behaviors of the animals.\nTwo racks of rabbit enclosures, containing six rabbits each, had water nipples that did not fully reach into the\ncage. The animal care staff had not noticed that the nipples did not break the plane of the back of the cage where\nthey were supposed to come into the cage through a hole approximately one and a half inches in diameter. The\nstaff had provided water bottles to two of the animals as an addition to the nipples. Having the nipple essentially\nrecessed into a small hole makes it difficult for the animal to easily access fresh water and could cause stress in the\nanimal and possibly lead to dehydration. Correct by ensuring that personnel are properly trained to monitor that the\nbasic needs of each animal are easily accessible.\nOne cat, that had recently had surgery, was noted to be in an enclosure that contained an Elizabethan collar.\nThe collar was not on the animal even though the surgical record said an E-collar would be used and did not have\nany end date for the wear of the device. The collar is used to prevent self-injurious behavior and, if not on, may lead\nto animal injury. Correct by ensuring personnel are properly trained to assure post-procedural care is provided and\ndocumented as directed.\nImmediate post-procedural care was outlined in the protocols for two animals but there was no documentation of\nthese procedures being performed by the investigative staff. An anesthesia record was present but did not indicate\nany animal information past the discontinuation of anesthesia or for the remainder of the procedure day. Animal\nnumber 23161 had no immediate post-procedural record and animal number 444 also had no immediate\npost-procedural record and facility personnel stated that the procedure may go as late as 8 PM at which point the\nanimal would be returned to its enclosure. Failure to complete proper post-procedural care could lead to animals\nexperiencing unnecessary pain or distress and, often, the only way to monitor that the investigators are following the\nstandards approved by the IACUC is by records review. Correct by ensuring personnel are properly trained and\ndocument their compliance with established post-procedural care.\nAll of the noted items above, except post-procedural care were addressed by the facility when identified by\nUSDA personnel. Correct against the future occurrence of these items by ensuring training and instruction of all\npersonnel in humane methods of animal maintenance and experimentation. The training must include: The basic\nneeds of each species of animal; Proper handling and care for the various species of animals used by the facility;\nProper pre-procedural and post- procedural care of animals; and Aseptic surgical methods and procedures.\nTo be corrected by 26 August 2016", "desc": "PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ca7c477cc227e39e", "label": "ca7c477cc227e39e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-07-12", "code": "2.32(c)(1)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 690.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470587-aphis-inspection-214161117250594", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 98, "narrative": "The IACUC identified seventeen instances of expired medications during their last semi-annual site visit (the\nnumber one deficiency identified). Only three of those medications were related to USDA covered species. While\nnone of these medications were found during this inspection, another four bottles of expired medication were found\nin animal facilities remote from the central pharmacy. Expired medications are considered adulterated and are not\nconsidered an appropriate method to prevent or treat diseases or injuries. If used on animals, expired medications\ncould fail to work as intended and possibly cause unexpected or adverse reactions. Correct by assuring there is a\nset procedure for the identification and disposal of expired medications in areas outside of the central pharmacy.\nTo be corrected by: 1 August 2016", "desc": "ATTENDING VETERINARIAN AND ADEQUATE VETERINARY CARE.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ca7c477cc227e39e", "label": "ca7c477cc227e39e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-07-12", "code": "2.33(b)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 690.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470587-aphis-inspection-214161117250594", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 99, "narrative": "Three primates were singly housed in adjacent cages in a narrow room at the time of inspection. The room had an\nempty cage that was visible from the other three cages but none of the primates could see another. The facility\nprimate enrichment plan included four criteria for enrichment of this species. One of the four criteria was social\nhousing that includes visual contact with others. This criteria was not met for these primates and individually housed\nnonhuman primates that are unable to see nonhuman primates of their own or compatible species require special\nattention. Inadequate social enrichment to primates can lead to behavioral problems that may manifest in abnormal\nand injurious behavior. Correct by assuring all primates receive at least the full enrichment outlined in the facility(cid:25)s\napproved enrichment plan and that certain nonhuman primates are provided special attention regarding\nenhancement of their environment, based on the needs of the individual species and in accordance with the\ninstructions of the attending veterinarian.\nAnother room contained nine primates in individual enclosures. Four enclosures had a foraging ball and three\nhad fleece tubes but one enclosure containing a primate (98007) with notable hairloss had neither of these\nenhanced enrichment devices. The four animals with enhanced enrichment had no documentation that they were\nreceiving the enrichment or were using it effectively. The behavior specialist does keep record of each primate and\na periodic review of their conditions but this record alone does not demonstrate whether enrichment is being\nprovided in an effective manner. Correct by assuring that those nonhuman primates that show signs of being in\npsychological distress, through behavior or appearance, are provided special attention as required.\nDuring two days of on-site inspection of animal facilities, it appeared that all primates, except the three above,\nwere receiving basic enrichment as directed by the enrichment plan. The animals determined to need special\nattention did not appear to be getting enough extra enrichment from the foraging balls and suet feeders used as\nextra enrichment. Some animals did have foraging devices attached to the enclosure but in two days of inspection,\nonly one device was found to contain enrichment. The facility had a room dedicated to, and stocked with,\nenrichment but the use of this enrichment was not evident or sufficiently documented to reasonably conclude that\nthe primates were benefitting from it. Facility personnel and the (cid:28)\"Monkey Helper\"(cid:29) form in the enrichment logs\nindicated that the primates determined to need special consideration received extra enrichment once each week.\nSince the enrichment was labor-intensive to set up and to clean up, it is apparent that more personnel would be\nneeded to increase the provision of extra enrichment. Correct by having the IACUC review the environmental\nenhancement plan regarding special attention primates, based on the needs of the individual species in consultation\nwith the behaviorist and in accordance with the instructions of the attending veterinarian.\nCorrect by 26 August 2016", "desc": "ENVIRONMENT ENHANCEMENT TO PROMOTE PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ca7c477cc227e39e", "label": "ca7c477cc227e39e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-07-12", "code": "3.81(c)(2)", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 690.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470587-aphis-inspection-214161117250594", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}
{"rowid": 100, "narrative": "During the inspection a room containing bats in 1 cubic foot butterfly transports was noted. The number of bats in\neach enclosure ranged from one to five. The bats were quietly hanging in their enclosures at the time of inspection\nand appeared to be normal. The protocol covering these bats did not describe the housing for the animals and\nspecifically did not address these 1 cubic foot enclosures as primary housing. At least two of the animals in these\nenclosures had been housed that manner for up to 23 hours a day since September of 2015 according to facility\nrecords and personal statements. To meet the requirement for sufficient space for normal social and postural\nadjustments with adequate freedom of movement, Subpart F species that fly (i.e., bats) should be provided with\nsufficient unobstructed enclosure volume to enable movement by flying and sufficient roosting space to allow all\nindividuals to rest simultaneously unless justified for scientific reasons in the protocol. Correct by: 18 July 2016\nAn exit briefing was conducted with David Oelberg DVM, Robert Brandes DVM, The IACUC Chair and facility\npersonnel.\nAdditional Inspectors\nBrandes Robert, Veterinary Medical Officer", "desc": "SPACE REQUIREMENTS.", "web_siteName": "JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE", "kind": null, "hash_id": {"value": "ca7c477cc227e39e", "label": "ca7c477cc227e39e"}, "web_inspectionDate": "2016-07-12", "code": "3.128", "repeat": 0, "pdf_insp_type": "ROUTINE INSPECTION", "pdf_animals_total": 690.0, "web_certType": "Class R - Research Facility", "pdf_customer_id": 81.0, "pdf_customer_name": "The Johns Hopkins University", "pdf_customer_addr": "265 Garland Hall\n3400 N Charles Street\nBaltimore, MD 21218", "customer_state": "MD", "pdf_site_id": "003", "doccloud_url": "https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470587-aphis-inspection-214161117250594", "lat": 39.3273434, "lng": -76.62155039999999}